BRIEFING LEAFLETS
21ATSBL03
20 December 2021
Pilots’ Responsibilities when Accepting
Air Traffic Control Clearances
I
CAO Annex 2, paragraph 2.4 specifies:
“The pilot-in-command of an aircraft shall have final authority as to the disposition of the
aircraft while in command.”
I
CAO Annex 6, Part I, paragraph 4.5.1 specifies:
“4.5.1 The pilot-in-command shall be responsible for the safety of all crew members,
passengers and cargo on board when the doors are closed. The pilot-in-command shall
also be responsible for the operation and safety of the aeroplane from the moment the
aeroplane is ready to move for the purpose of taking off until the moment it finally
comes to rest at the end of the flight and the engine(s) used as primary propulsion units
are shut down.
T
his concept must always be in the forefront of pilots’ minds during all aspects of operations
including when receiving an air traffic control clearance, instruction, or authorization
(“clearance”). Pilots must determine whether they are able to safely execute all aspects of any
clearance received prior to accepting and executing that clearance. Pilots are obligated to
inform air traffic control (ATC) if they are unable to accept a clearance as given. Pilots are also
obligated to obtain an amended clearance at any time they are no longer able to execute a
clearance that was previously accepted.
P
ilots should be aware that any responsibility ATC assumes by issuing a clearance to a flight
does not in any way transfer safety responsibility away from the pilot-in-command. More
appropriately, pilots should view ATC responsibilities as, at most, additional assistance in
maintaining a safe operation.
T
his briefing leaflet provides two examples of consequences not always apparent with regard to
the acceptance of two types of clearances. It should be noted that this briefing leaflet refers to
ICAO procedures and that national or regional procedures might differ, sometimes providing
less protection than the ICAO provisions.
2
“Maintain own separation”
During daylight VMC conditions below FL100, controlled flights including departing and arriving
flights, could be instructed to maintain their own separation from another aircraft. If accepted,
this clearance requires the pilot to determine and maintain a safe distance from the designated
aircraft. More appropriately, pilots should treat this as the removal of all ATC separation
responsibility from the designated aircraft. Many factors may affect what the pilot considers to
be a safe distance both in lateral and vertical distances. Pilots are required to maneuver their
aircraft as necessary to avoid operating in such proximity to other flights as to create a collision
hazard.
Though not readily apparent, safe separation includes accounting for the effects of the
preceding aircraft’s wake vortices.
Achieving and maintaining a safe distance from another aircraft is very difficult without specific
tools being introduced onto the flight deck. IFALPA has policy which currently discourages the
pilot-in-command in accepting ATC instructions to maintain their own visual separation because
the risk of collision is increased. This policy has recently been further strengthened, stating that
pilots are not to accept ATC instructions to maintain their own separation until tools are
provided that assist pilots in consistently identifying and mitigating the increased risks of
collision and wake turbulence upset during this type of operation.
“Resume own navigation”
During many operations, there are instances that require ATC to vector a flight off of a
published route. As stated previously, the pilot-in-command is always responsible for the safe
operation of the aircraft, but, in this case, ATC must assume a complementary responsibility in
addition to that of the pilot-in-command for terrain/obstacle clearance while executing the off-
route clearance, because the pilot might not have adequate information about the minimum
altitude along the track to be flown.
The PANS-ATM requirement on ATC that the controller shall issue clearances such that the
prescribed obstacle clearance will exist at all times (while executing the off route clearance) in no
way alleviates the flight crew’s responsibilities. The flight crew must maintain a constant
awareness of their position and relevant terrain and obstacles during the off-route vector.
As before, the flight crew is obligated to refuse the vector clearance if they believe the safety of
flight would be in doubt. Even when pilots have Minimum Vectoring Altitude charts in their
route documentation it is often challenging to determine in which sector the aircraft is or will be
during the vectoring or direct routing. Pilots should remain vigilant of potential infringements of
the minimum obstacle clearance requirements when being vectored.
When ATC is ready to return the aircraft to a published route, pilots may receive vectors to a
point along the route followed by, “…resume own navigation.” Some States allow their ANSPs to
issue clearances to “resume own navigation” direct to a point on a route or instrument
3
procedure and consider the controller’s responsibility to assure adequate terrain and obstacle
clearance ending with this clearance.
For the reason highlighted above, ATC clearances shall ensure safe terrain/obstacle clearance
until the aircraft is established on the published route and the flight crew resumes their own
navigation on the cleared route where they have valid information on the applicable minimum
safe altitude again. Again, the flight crew must evaluate the flight path back to the route and
ensure that it is safe. Otherwise, the flight crew is obligated to request alternative instructions.
These issues and the lack of clarity as to when ATC’s additional assistance begins and ends is
being discussed and reviewed for a change to the provisions in PANS-ATM and PANS-OPS
which highlight and reinforce the imperative to achieve the minimum obstacle clearance during
all operations. IFALPA believes that the risk of pilots being unable to cross-check the minimum
altitude during vectoring must be mitigated by special emphasis on correct and safe altitude
clearances by air traffic controllers.
©2021 The International Federation of Air Line Pilots’ Associations. This publication is provided for information purposes only, in all
cases pilots should follow their company’s guidance and procedures. In the interest of flight safety, reproduction of this publication in
whole or in part is encouraged. It may not be offered for sale or used commercially. All reprints must credit IFALPA.
