1
EXAMPLE ESSAYS FOR
Critical Thinking and Writing for Nursing Students
Bob Price and Anne Harrington
CONTENTS:
Example analytical essay - page 1
Example reflective essay - page 11
EXAMPLE ANALYTICAL ESSAY
ThisexampleofananalyticalessayispresentedinassociationwithPrice,BandHarrington,A(2010)
CriticalThinkingandWritingforNursingStudents,Exeter,LearningMatters.Readersare
introducedtotheprocessofcriticalandreflectivethinkingandthetranslationoftheseinto
courseworkthatwillhelpthemto
achievebettergradesinnursingcourses.Stewart,Raymet,Fatima
andGinaarefourstudentswhosharetheirlearningjourneythroughoutthechaptersofthebook.In
thisessayontheevaluationofdifferentsortsofevidence,Stewartdemonstrateshiswritingskills
neartheendofhiscourse.Stewartwassetthe
taskofevaluatingdifferentsortsofevidencewithin
nursingandmakingacaseregardinghowthenursemightproceed.Attheendoftheessayweoffer
notesthatexplainthecriticalthinkingandwritingfeaturesofStewart’swork.
N.B.Remember,copyingessayssuchasthis,submittingthemasa
wholeorinpartforassessment
purposes,withoutattributingthesourceofthematerial,mayleaveyouopentothechargeof
plagiarism.Significantsanctionsmayfollowfornurseswhodothis,includingreferraltotheNursing
andMidwiferyCouncil.
Evaluatingevidenceinnursing
Forreasonsofpatientsafetyandtheimprovementsinthequalityofhealthcare,nursesareurged
tobasetheirpracticeonevidence(Barker,2009).Evidencetoomaybearguedasabasisfor
arrangingthemostcosteffectivecare,usinglimitedresourcestobesteffect.Idefineevidence
hereasconsistingofthatinformationthatthenursecanpointtoasauthoritative,beingmore
thansimpleopinionorpredilectiontopracticeinaparticularway.Inpractice,theavailabilityof
evidencemaybelimited,someevidencemaycontradictotherevidenceandthenursemust
thereforemakejudgementsaboutwhatisfound(Jolley,2009).Itisnecessarytonotethat
differentsortsofevidencemaybeusedtodifferentpurpose.Forexample,evidenceof how
patientsexperienceillnesscantellthenurseabouthowpatientsfeelandwhatmattersmostto
them.Itcannotguidethenurseonwhatsortsofcarearemosteffective.Statisticalevidence,
especiallythatoriginatingfromrobustexperiments,mighthelpthenursetodeterminewhat
causesaparticulareffectandtodecidewhethertoarrangecaredifferently.Notallevidenceis
thesamethen,someismorepowerfulthanothers,andafitbetweenevidenceandpractice
2
needstobedetermined(Brotchieetal,2010).
InthispaperIfirstreviewthedifferenttypesofevidencethatmaybeavailabletothenurse.I
thenusetheworkofProctorandRosen(2004)tohighlightpossiblefitsbetweenevidenceand
effortstoimprovepractice.Thethirdpartofthispapersummarisespointsabouthowbestto
judgethedifferentevidenceavailable—thecriteriatobeusedwilldiffer,dependentonthe
evidenceconsidered.Iarguethecasethatthenurseevaluatesevidencewellwhereheorshe
understandsthenatureoftheevidence,establisheswherethatevidencemightservewelland
makeswisejudgementsontheauthority,completenessandcoherenceoftheevidenceavailable.
Typesofevidence
Whilstevidencecanbeclassifiedindifferentways,Isuggestherethatitisusefultomake
distinctionsbetweenresearchandexperientialevidenceinthefirstinstanceandthenwithin
researchevidencetonotethattherearedifferentresearchdesignsthataffectthenatureof
evidencepresented.Itmayseemcontentioustothinkofexperienceasaformofevidence,butin
practiceitisfrequentlycalleduponasjustthat(e.g.Finlay,2009;Beametal,2010).Atits
weakest,groupsofnursesdevelopaworkingimpressionofhowpatientscope,howcareis
deliveredandwhatconsequencesemergeifnursingisdeliveredinparticularways.Inmy
experience,nursesmightrefertothisaspracticewisdom,acollectiveknowhowthatseemsto
workwellwithgivengroupsofpatients.Suchevidenceprovidesatbestafirstimpression,and
overviewofissues.Itisenhanced wherethenurseplansreflectionandobservationmore
carefully,withreferencetoparticularquestionsandfocusingperhapsoncasestudiesthatallow
matterstobemappedanddiscussed(Leach,2007).Itincreasesstature,asevidence,tothe
degreethatinformationisgatheredinadisciplinedandorganisedway,andwithastatedpurpose
inmind.Thatexperientialevidenceisimportantinhealthcareisimportantisillustrated bythe
analysisofcasestudiesincareandespeciallythoseassociatedwithriskmanagement(e.g.
Stewart,2010).Nursesandothersmayanalysecasesinsomedepthtoestablishwhatwent
wrong,whatwasmissedormisinterpreted,allwiththeaimofavoidingmistakesandofimproving
performanceinthefuture.
Themorefamiliarformofevidencethatmostcolleaguesrefertowhendiscussingevidencebased
practiceisthatwhichemergesfromresearch(Barker,2009).Researchproducesevidence
preciselybecauseofthedisciplinedwayinwhichenquiriesarearrangedandtheeffortsmadeto
gatherdatathatattendtotheaims,questionsorhypothesesoftheresearchproject.Designsare
influentialhere.Researchthathasbeendesignedwithinthepositivisttraditionworksassiduously
toremovetheriskofresearcherbiasandtogathersufficientdataoftherighttypetomakeclaims
aboutapopulationofpeople.Thereisanemphasisuponimpartialenquiry,withtheresearcher
arrangingchecksbyotherssuchascriticalreviewerstoensurethatassumptionsarenot
prematurelymadeaboutwhatisfound(Grix,2004).
Otherresearchisconductedwithinthenaturalisticorinterpretivetradition(e.g.phenomenology,
groundedtheory,someformsofethnography)andheretheworkproceedsdifferently.The
researcherarguesthatitismoreimportanttoconductworkthatisauthentictohealthcare,than
toconductastudythathasexcludingallpossibleformsofbias(Silverman,2004).Thegoalofsuch
researchisoftentohelpothersportraytheirexperienceofhealth,illnessorcareandtohelp
3
nursesunderstandwhatpatientsandothersmightneedorhopefor(Brotchieetal,2010).The
researchermightsuggestthatitisimpossibletocompletelydisassociatethemselvesfrom
perspectivesorviewsthatcouldshapethelineofenquiry.Athirdresearchdesignmaybe
describedascriticaltheory(Swartz,1997).Theresearcherstartswithacknowledgedgoalsto
correctinequalitiesinhealthorcareandtomakeacaseforthedisadvantaged.Feministresearch
forexampleacknowledgesthattheresearcherwillnotstanddispassionatelyasidewhen
deliberatingonwhatneedstobediscoveredorhowevidencemightsupportacaseforchange.
Sometimesnaturalisticandcriticaltheoryresearchisgroupedtogetheras‘qualitativeresearch’
becausetheyoftenproducequalitativedataandincontrasttothequantitativedatathat
sometimesemergesfrompositivistresearch(GreenandThorogood,2009).
Whatseemssignificantinthisoverviewofdifferentresearchdesigns,isthatthereisno
universallyagreedgoalofresearch,noristheevidenceproducedallofonesort.Researchers
adoptdifferentrolesdependingonthedesignofresearchused.Inpositivistresearchtheroleof
theresearcheristypicallydescribedasdispassionateandtheyproceedtogatherinformation
fromoutsidetheexperienceofothers(itisdescribedas‘etic’).Innaturalisticandcriticaltheory
researchtheresearcheroftenapproachestheirsubjectmuchmoreclosely,int imately,for
exampleobservingandinterviewingasaparticipantinthesituationexplored(itisdescribedas
‘emic’)(Brotchieetal,2010).Togatherauthenticdatatheresearcherpermitsthemselvesto
becomeinvolvedinproceedings,tousetheirownexperienceaspartoftheprocessof
interpretingwhathasbee nwitnessed.Thesedistinctionsareimportantifthenurseisnottouse
researchevidenceinappropriately,assomethingthatwasneverintendedbytheresearcher,
makingclaimsthatareunsupportable.Theevaluatingnurseneedstounderstandtheresearch
designaswellastheresearchevidenceonoffer.
Evidenceandpracticefit
Itistemptingtoarguethatonesortofevidence(positivist)issuperiortoallothersandthatitis
uponthatwhichnursingshouldbebased.Thisisattractivewherenurseswishtohighlightnursing
asascienceandwhereprecisionisakeyconsiderationincare.Itisextremelyattractivewhere
thenursehastomanageriskanddefendactions,especiallyiflitigationisaconsideration.Nursing
thoughdrawsuponmanydifferentsortsofevidenceandthisisinlargepartbecausethenurse
workswithotherstomakesenseofhealthandillness(AveyardandSharp,2009).Ifthenurse
helpsthepatienttodecidewhatchronicillnessmeanstothem,andtodevisecopingstrategies
thatseemmanageable,theyareworkingtohelpothersmanageuncertainty.Therecanbeno
singlegoldstandardsolution,becausepatientscircumstancesandneedsaredifferentandvery
individual.Itfollowsthenthatresearchwhichattendstothisprocess,ofmakingsenseofwhat
hashappenedandwhatmighthelpnowisalsovaluable.Suchresearchismorespeculativein
nature,moretentativeasregardswhatcanbeprovenorclaimed.Nursingthenmayrequireboth
‘hard’and‘soft’evidence,thefirstconcernedwithwhatworks,whatissafeandbeneficialand
thesecondassociatedwithprocess,howitfeelsorwhatitmeanstorecoverorrehabilitatefor
example.
ProctorandRosen(2004)describeastepwiseprocessforfindingandevaluatingresearchthat
mightcontributetoevidencebasedpractice(seeTable1).Importantly,thepurposeofthe
evaluationneedstobeunderstoodfirst.Whatoutcomesisthenursemostinterestedin?Itis
4
necessarytoreviewthatresearchwhichfitsclearlywiththeidentifiednursingneed,andfor
ProctorandRosen(2004)thisislargelyaboutdemonstratingtangibleimprovementsincare
(outcomes).InStep2thenurseselectsfromtheevidencereviewedthebestfittingintervention,
thatwhichachievesthedesirableoutcome.InStep3thenursesupplementsormodifiesthe
intervention,drawingupontheirexperienceandknowledge.Thisthirdstepcanseem
contentious,butitisimportantwhereresearchwasconductedindifferentcontextstothe
practiceconsidered,orwheretheresearchevidenceavailableisincompleteorperhaps
contradictory.InStep4thenursemonitorsandevaluatesthechangedpractice,tomakesurethat
thedesirableoutcomeissustained.
Table1:Developingevidencebasedpracticeguidelinesandanursingillustration(adaptedfrom
ProctorandRosen,2004)
Step Illustration
Step1:Locateevidencebasedinterventions
relevanttotheoutcomesofinterest.
Thenurseisinterestedinhelpingpatientsto
managetheirasthmabetter.Three
interventionsarelocatedwithintheresearch
literature,oneassociatedwithgroupteaching,
anotherwiththeuseofvideotraininganda
thirdlinkedtocoaching.
Step2:Selectthebestfittinginterventionin
viewofclientproblems,situationand
outcomes.
Thenurseselectstheinterventionthat
producestherequiredoutcome(patient
independence)andwhichalsoisaffordableand
realisablegiventhetimeandexpertise
available.Inthisexampleitmightbegroup
teaching.
Step3:Supplement/modifythebest
intervention,usingnurseexperienceand
knowledgesothatitfitswithpracticecontext.
Groupteachingiscosteffectivebutdemanding
ontheskillsofthenurse,sotomakethiswork
moreeasily,ateacherguidancepackis
produced,onethatwillleadtoconsistentand
wellorganisedteachingsessions.
Step4:Monitorandev aluatethe e f fectiveness
oftheoutcome.
Overthenextyearthenursemonitorspatients’
levelsofselfcareandtheincidenceof
readmissionstohospitalforasthmacrises.
Expressedconfidenceandlowerincidenceof
hospitalreadmissionareseenasindictorsof
bettercoping.
InTable1itispossibletoimaginepositivistresearchbeingusedinassociationwithStep2(thesort
ofresearchthatfocusesuponcauseandeffectrelationships),whilstnaturalisticandpossiblycritical
theoryresearchmighthaveaparttoplayinStep3.Forinstance,therewouldbeacasetoconsider
researchrelatingtopatientexperience(ofasthmaeducation)alongsidethatwhichsuggestedthe
bestwaytoproceedifindependentlivingwasthegoal.Theroleofexperientialevidenceismuch
lessclearintheProctorandRosen(2004)approachandforsomecolleaguesitmightbeseentonot
havearoleatall.Nevertheless,experienceofparticularpatients,theirneedsandlevelof
confidence,theskillsofstaff(inthisinstanceaspatienteducators)couldandperhapsshouldfactor
indeterminingwhichinterventionisused.Coachingforexamplerequiresconsiderableskillsand
longtermcommitment,somethingthatmightseemlessfeasiblehere.
5
Judgingevidence
Asdifferentevidenceisfound,thereisaneedforthenursetojudgeitsmerits(AveyardandSharp,
2009).Justhowtheevidenceisjudgedisassociatedwiththedesignoftheresearch,orinthecaseof
experience,theprocessbywhichitwasgathered,collatedanddiscussed.Inpositivistresearch
judgementfocusesupontheauthorityofthedesignandthisisjudgedusingthreequestions.First,
wastheresearchethical—canwereasonablydrawuponthisevidence?Second,whetherthe
researchwasreliable—ifthestudywasdoneagain,wouldwebelikelytoobtainthesameorvery
similarresults?Third,whethertheresearchwasvalid—diditasktherightquestions,attendtothe
correctstudypopulationandsecureaviablesample?Inshor t,didtheresearchmethodshelpthe
researchersecureenoughoftherelevantinformationtomeettheaimsofthestudy,toanswerthe
questionsorpermitthereviewofhypothesesstated?Whereinformationofthiskindismissingfrom
theresearchreport,orthedesignarrangementsseemambiguous,doubtsareraisedaboutthe
validityand/orthereliabilityoffindings.
Differentjudgementcriteriaareusedwithregardtonaturalisticresearchandtheseareusually
associatedwiththeauthenticityofdataobtained(Brotchieetal,2010).Thereviewersearchestosee
iftheresearcherhasleftanaudittrail ofhowtheresultswerearrivedatandhowfieldworkordata
analysisdecisionsweremade.Theresearchismeanttotellastoryaboutthereasoningofthe
researcher,sothatthenursecanestimatewhether(intheirexperience)theresultsreportedare
likelytoberepresentativeofwhatresearchsubjectsmightreport.Judgementinthisresearch
involvesagreateramountofwhatIterm‘freestyle’reasoning.Thenurseasks,dotheseresults
seemlikely,importantandcentralgivenwhathasbeenwrittenandwhatIknowwithinmyown
nursingwork?
Judgingcriticaltheoryresearchseemsrathermoredifficult.Itentailsestablishingwhetherthe
researcherhashonestlyandfullystatedtheirpremisesaboutthesubjectconcerned,the
assumptionsthattheystartwithastheyconductresearch(Brotchieetal,2010).Itinvolves
evaluatingwhethertheresearcherhasbeenclearaboutthecriticalfilter,thepremisesthathave
beenusedtoselectdataforcollectionanditsinterpretationafterwards.
Judgingexperientialevidenceisdifficult.Whilstreflectiveframeworksfocusontheanalysisof
experience,mostoftheseoperatetootherpurposes,typicallythedevelopmentofthenurses’
thinkingskills(JohnsandFreshwater,2005).Theyarenotyetusedtoimprovethequalityof
healthcareexperiencereporting,asasofterformofevidence.Questionsthatmightbeusedto
distinguishmoreconvincingexperientialevidencethoughinclude:
Havequestionsbeenusedtofocusthereflectionsundertaken?
Havethereflectionsbeenrecordedsoonaftertheexperienceiscomplete?
Havethereflectionsbeendiscussedbyagroupofpractitionersworkinginthesame
area(e.g.apracticereviewgroup?)
Haveeffortsbeenmadetorefineorimprovethereflectiveactivity,sothat information
isbetterunderstood?
6
Conductingreflectionintheseways,asacollectiveandcriticalactivityaddsdisciplinetotheprocess
andenablesthereviewertoweighthepointsbeingmadeasaresultofthereflectionsundertaken.
Evaluationproblems
Whatbringstheabovethingstogether,anunderstandingofthedifferenttypesofevidence,a
processforrelatingevidencetoachosenpracticeandthejudgingofthequalityofevidence;is
systematicevaluation.ProctorandRosen(2004)demonstratesuchasystematicapproach,although
inthisessayIsuggestthattheevaluationmightconsidermorethantheauthorsoriginallyintended.I
proposethatitcouldbeusedtodescribehowresearchandexperientialevidencecouldbe
combined.Thenurseascertainswhatworksandthenconsiderstheprocessofworkingtowardsa
newpractice—thatwhichisrealisable.
Whatisburiedherearethedifficultdecisionswhenevidenceispatchyandcontradictory.Notonly
mighttherenotbeenoughresearchevidence,buttheevidencefromexperiencemightbe
inconclusiveaswell.Thenurseisleftwithapartialpictureofnursingcare,whatmighthelppatients,
howpatientsexperiencethatcareandwhatwouldenablethenursetoproceeddifferently.Under
theseconditionsitmaybeimpossibletoevaluatetheevidence,atleastbeyondnotingthatitis
incomplete,contradictoryorincoherent.Thenthenursehastoproceedwithnewinvestigations,
eithermoreresearchorreflection,sothatthevolumeandqualityofevidenceincrease.Inthe
meantime,nursingcarecontinuesbasedupontraditionorwhatmightbeconsidered‘common
sense’solutions(i.e.thosethatthenursebelieveswillhelpbutforwhichthereisnoproofof
success).
Conclusions
Thisessayhasdescribedthedifferentcomponentsofworkasanurseevaluatesevidence.Itsuggests
thatthenursehastohaveagoodappreciationofthedifferenttypesofevidenceandwhatisoffered
there.Failingtoappreciatethatcouldleadtothenursedistortingtheevidence,usingittopurposeit
cannotsupport.Clarityisneededtoothoughasregardswhatpurposetheevidencereviewhasto
serve.Whatdowereallywanttodoorknowhere?Beforethenursecanconcludewhatthe
evidenceoffers,heorshemustevaluatethemeritofindividualevidence—somethingeasiertodo
withregardtoresearchwheretherearelongerestablishedcriteriabywhichtomeasurethequality
ofwork.Insomeinstancesthenursemusthonestlyconcedethatthereisinsufficientclearor
coherentevidencetorecommendaparticularwayforward.
Thecasestatedatthestartofthispaperdoeshoweverseemsupported.Consideringeachofthe
abovethings,thenurseevaluatesevidenceinamoremethodicalwayandusingrelevantquestions
tojudgewhathasbeenfound.Itispossibleforgroupsofnursestowor ktogethertoevaluateto
clearerpurpose,insteadoftheadhocwaythatindividualnursesmighthavedoneinthepast.
Withoutanunderstandingofeachoftheabove,nurseswouldnothaveidentifiedconsistentwaysto
engageinevidenceevaluation—somethingthatisimportantifnursingistodevelopareputationfor
evidencebasedpractice.
7
References
Aveyard,HandSharp,P(2009)Abeginner’sguidetoevidencebasedpracticeinhealthandsocial
care,MiltonKeynes,OpenUniversityPress/McGrawHill
Barker,J(2009)Evidencebasedpracticefornurses,London,Sage
Beam,R.,O’Brien,Randneal,M(2010)Reflectivepracticeenhancespublichealthnurse
implementationofnursefamilypartnership,PublicHealthNursing,27(2),131139.
Brotchie,J,Clark,L.,Draper,J.,Price,BandSmith,P(2010)Designinghealthcareresearch(K824
StudyGuide)MiltonKeynes,TheOpenUniversity
Finlay,I(2009)Developingatemplatetoplanpalliativecareservices:theWelshexperience,Journal
ofPainandSymptomManagement,38(1),816.
Green,JandThorogood,N(2009)Qualitativemethodsforhealthresearch,2
nd
ed,London,Sage
Grix,J(2004)Thefoundationsofresearch,Basingstoke,PalgraveMacMillan
Johns,CandFreshwater,D(eds)(2005)Transformingnursingthroughreflectivepractice,2
nd
ed.
Oxford,Blackwell
Jolley,J(2009)Introducingresearchevidencebasedpracticefornurses,Harlow,Pearson
Educational.
Leach,M(2007)Revisitingtheevaluationofclinicalpractice,InternationalJournalofNursing
Practice,13(2),7074
Proctor,EandRosen,A(2004)‘Concisestandardsfordevelopingevidencebasedpracticeguidelines
inRoberts,AandYeager,K(eds)Evidencebasedpracticemanual:researchandoutcomemeasures
forhealthandhumanscience,Oxford,OxfordUniversityPress193199.
Silverman,D(2004)Qualitativeresearch;theory,methodandpractice,2
nd
ed.LondonSage.
Stewart,D(2010)Diagnosisandmanagementofanadultpatientwithanatrialseptaldefect,Nurse
Practitioner,35(2),811.
Swartz,O(1997)Conductingsociallyresponsibleresearch:criticaltheory,neopragmatismand
rhetoricalenquiry,ThousandOaksCalifornia,Sage.
8
Ournotes
Youmightbestruckuponfirstreadingjusthowpolishedthisessayisandwonderwhetheryoucould
producesomethingquitesoconvincing.Beforeyoujudgesuchthings,rememberthata)Stewarthas
receivedparticularteachingonevidencebasedpracticeandb)thatheiswritingattheendofhis
course.Hiswork,ashewouldconcede,wasnotalwayssowelldeveloped!Seebeyondthepolish
thenandconsiderthestructureofthisessay.Lookbeyondwhetheryouagreewithhispoints,for
exampleaboutwhatdoesordoesn’tconstituteevidence,todeterminehowhebroughtinformation
togetherto
createthefinalimpressionofthiswork.
Theintroduction
Theintroductionconsistsoftwoparagraphs,thefirstofwhichisdesignedtocapturethereader's
interestandestablishwhatheiswritingabout,andthesecondofwhichisusedtosignposthowthe
restofthepaperissetoutandthecasethatheismaking.Stewartcaptures
ourinterestbylinking
hispapertotheimportanceplacedonevidencebasedpracticeinnursingtoday.Thisisnota
whimsicalorpassinginterest—nursesneedtoknowaboutit!Inthesecondparagraphhesetsout
hiscasebrieflyandclearly.Inanalyticalessays,especiallyasinthisinstance
whentheyevaluate
whatisinvolvedinparticularnursingwork,statingthecaseisveryhelpfulindeed.Itindicatestothe
readerthattheauthorknowswhereheisgoing,whatheistryingtodemonstrateinthepaper.Itis
almostasthoughwearechallengedbythecase.Do
Iagreewiththis?DoIthinkthatthesethings
wouldleadto bett erevaluationofevidence?Asaresultwereadthepapermoreattentively.
ThisisquiteasophisticatedsubjectsothereareanumberoftermsthatStewartneedstouse.He
neededtodecidewhichhe
wouldassumethatthereaderunderstoodandwhichwouldneedtobe
defined.Inthisexamplehedefinesevidenceasheusesitinthiscontext.Youcouldconsiderthatit
mightstrengthenapaperifyouusedapublisheddefinitionofatermsuchasthis.Inthisinstance
though,
asheismakinghisownpointaboutwhatconstitutesevidence,somethingmorethansome
othersmightinclude,hesetsouthisowndefinition.Whilstitisrighttodrawthereaders’attention
toreferencesources,andtobuildthesetogetherinsupportofyourowncase,itisstill
necessaryfor
youtohaveadoptedapositionofyourown.Simplyreportingeveryoneelse’scase,theirarguments,
willnotusuallybeenoughtosecurethebestpossiblemarks.Thisisakey pointinlearningtothink
critically.
Typesofevidence
ThecraftingoftheparagraphsinthissectiontookStewartsometime.Eachhadtosummariseatype
ofevidenceclearlyandsuccinctlyandinsuchawaythatthereaderunderstoodwhathebelieved.
Thereisagreatdealofcompressionofinformationhere,hesummarisesagreatdealand
thereisa
realriskthathecouldoversimplifyormisrepresentpointsifheincludestoomuch.Hegoesstraight
intoanargumentthatexperience,whenobservedandreflecteduponadequately,canconstitutea
typeofevidence.Thisisperhapscontentious,butbymakingthisargumentfirst,heensuresthat
he
setsoutarobustposition.‘Iamwritingaboutthisfirst,becausethisiswhatIbelieve.IfIwrote
aboutitlastinthissection,itmightseemlikeanafterthought’.Noticehowheusesexamplesfrom
practicetoreinforcehisclaimregardingthecredentialsofexperientialevidence.Audit,
riskanalysis
work,reviewsofcasesthathavegonewrong,allhighlighttheimportanceofexperiencetopractice.
9
Later,Stewartwillarguethattoimprovethecredentialsofsuchevidence,reflectionwillneedtobe
moresystematicandcollective.
Paragraphdisciplineisimportantwhenyoutrytoconveyagreatdealofinformationinasmall
volumeofwords.Makesurethateachparagraphisaboutaclear
subject(inthiscase,thedifferent
typesofevidence)andthatwithinthoseparagraphsyouavoidexcessivelylongsentences.Try
readingaloudthesentence—ifyoufindyourselfpausingforbreath,itmayalreadybetoolong.
Thelastparagraphinthissectionisespeciallyimportant.HereStewartshowshisreasoning
asthe
essayproceeds.Hemakessomejudgementsaboutresearchevidenceasaformandnotesthatitis
veryvaried.Itreallywouldbetoosimpletodescribeitasonething,somethingtobecontrasted
againstexperientialevidence.Itismanythings,andthenurseneedstounderstandeach
ifthe
evidenceistobereviewedwell.
Evidenceandpracticefit
First,wemaketwostylisticpoints.NoticehowStewartisusingsubheadingstohelpthereader
navigatehisessay.Historically,subheadingswerenotusedwidelywithinacademicessays,butwe
suggestthattheyarevaluable.Ifyouwerewritingfornursingjournals,youwouldalsousesub
headingsto
guidethereader.Second,noticetheuseofthetable.Stewartusesthistoconvey
informationquicklyandclearlyandcombinesthatprovidedbysomeotherauthors(leftcolumn)
withpointsofhisown(rightcolumn).ThesourceofinformationisattributedandStewartbegins
hereanillustration(asthma)that
willhelphimtoexplainimportantpoints.Stewartshouldadd
referencestothethreeapproachestoasthmaeducation,astheywouldnormallycomefrom
publishedwork.HereStewartisusingideasasanillustration,itisanexampleonlyofwhatmightbe
found.Byandlarge,assessorswillpreferthat
studentsdrawuponactualexamplesfromthe
literature,demonstratingthestudent’sworkwithinthelibrary.Imaginativeandpertinentthough
Stewart’sworkis,itonlyshowswhatmightbepossible,thestrongercasedrawsonthatalready
arguedordemonstratedelsewhere.
Ifthelastsectionwasmadeofparagraphargumentsabout
whatcountedasevidence,thissection
setsouttoarguethataprocesscanhelpexplainhowevidenceandpracticerequirementscanbe
matched.HeusesProctorandRosen’s(2004)frameworktoshowthisworkinaction.Atthispointit
wouldbeeasytowriteextensivelyabouttheframework,where
itcamefrom,whodesignedit,but
todosowouldbeadistraction.Frameworksofthiskindareheuristic,thatis,theyserveapurpose,
andrightnowthisistoshowhowdifferenttypesofevidencecouldserveastatedpurpose.Ourown
viewofthisisthat
Stewartmanagesthisratherwell,withthepossibleexceptionofhislastpoints
aboutdrawingexperientialevidenceintotheprocess.Stewartisboldhere,hesuggeststhat
experientialevidencehasaroletoplay,butperhapsthisisnotapointfullysubstantiateduntillater,
whenhedescribeswhatisrequired
tomaketheevidencemorerobust.
Judgingevidence
Thisisanothersectionwhereinformationhasbeencompressed.Wholetextbookshavebeen
writtenonhowtoevaluateresearch!Nonetheless,ifStewartistosupportthecasethatthisworkis
butapartofevidenceevaluation,heneedstoconveytheessentialinformationquicklyandclearly.
Largerdebatesandexplanations,
forinstanceaboutthedifferentsortsofvalidity,cannotfindspace
10
hereandwewouldsupporthisselectionofpoints.Validity,reliability,authent icityandaudittrailare
importantconsiderationsinjudgingresearch.Hadwewishedtoaskforfurtherelaborationonanyof
them,itwouldbeimportanttoalsosuggestwhatelsehemighthaveomittedinthisessayto
make
roomforthis.
Noticehoweachgroupofjudgementsisassigneditsownparagraph—thisaddstotheoverall
impressionofadisciplinedessay.Attheend,inthefinalparagraphheusesbulletpointsto
introducehisownrecommendedcriteriaforjudgingexperientialevidence.Thisisanotherboldstep,
onethatdemonstratesthatStewartisreasoningconfidently.Irrespectiveofwhetherreadersagree
hisstancehere,weth inkthattheseareindeedthingswhichwouldmakereflectionmore
systematic—moredisciplinedinwaysthatwemightexpectifevidencewastoresult.
Evaluationproblems
ItwasatthisjuncturethatStewartrealisedsomethingwasmissing.Hisoriginalessayplanhadnot
includedthissection!Whenhewasplanningtheessay,hethoughtthatiftheabovethree
componentsofevidenceevaluationwerearguedthathewouldhaveaconvincingaccountof what
evidenceevaluationentailed.
Theproblemisthatevidenceisrarelythatcomplete,coherentorneat.
Sotheadditionofthissectionnicelyhighlightsthentheneedtostopandpausesometimesandto
considerwhetherwhatyouhavewrittenisadequate.Stewartneededtoaddsomethingmore,and
hadsomewordspaceto
dothis.That'something'wasaboutwhathappenedifthecomponentparts
oftheevaluationwerenotenough,iftheydidnotsuggestabestwayforward.
Thisisquiteashortsection,andperhapsyoufeelthatStewartdidnotquiteclinchthepoint?Itis
notmerelythecase
thatsometimesthatevidencedoesnotcometogetherwell,orthatitis
incompleteorcontradictory, itisthattheworkingwithuntidy,incompleteandsometimesconfusing
evidenceisfrequentlya challengeforth enurse.Thesuccessfulevaluatorofevidenceconfrontsthis
confidentlyandispreparedtoargue'wedon’t
haveenoughev idenceheretoproceed'.Decision
makingatthispointpossiblydistinguishesthemorefromthelesssuccessfulevidenceevaluators!It
perhapsrequiresgreatintegritytomakethisdecision,whenthepressurebuildstochangepractice
insomeway.
Conclusions
Conclusionshavetworoles.Thefirstistosummarisewhathasalreadygonebefore—somethingthat
Stewartdoesinthefirstparagraph.Thesecondistodemonstratetheauthor’sdeductionsabout
whathasgonebefore.Inthisinstancethatisthatthecasehesetoutatthestartoftheessay
is
supported.Stewartarguesthatsuccessfulevaluationisfoundeduponamixtureofthingsandthe
moresystematicallytheseareconducted,thebetter.Hisessaywouldbeevenstrongerifhehad
arguedthattheprocesswastransparenttootherswholistenedtothecaseforchangemade
afterwards.
11
EXAMPLE REFLECTIVE ESSAY
ThisexampleofareflectiveessayispresentedinassociationwithPrice,BandHarrington,A(2010)
CriticalThinkingandWritingforNursingStudents,Exeter,LearningMatters.Readersare
introducedtotheprocessofcriticalandreflectivethinkingandthetranslationoftheseinto
courseworkthatwillhelpthemtoachieve
bettergradesinnursingcourses.Stewart,Raymet,Fatima
andGinaarefourstudentswhosharetheirlearningjourneythroughoutthechaptersofthebook.In
thisessayontheassessmentofpain,Raymetdemonstratesherreflectivewritingskillsnear theend
ofhercourse.Raymethadbythisstagewritten
severalreflectivepracticeessaysandgainedgood
marks.Thistimethoughsh ewasencouragedtodeepenherreflections,speculatingselectivelyon
howtheaccountofpainexperiencedbyapatient(MrsDrew)mighthelphertoworkmorecreatively
withpatientperceptionsandreportedneeds.
N.B.Remember,copyingessayssuch
asthis,submittingthemasawholeorinpartforassessment
purposes,withoutattributingthesourceofthematerial,mayleaveyouopentothechargeof
plagiarism.Significantsanctionsmayfollowfornurseswhodothis,includingreferraltotheNursing
andMidwiferyCouncil.
AssessingMrsDrew’sPain
McCafferyandPasero(1999)statethatpainiswhatthepatientsaysitis.Ifweacceptthatpoint,
thennursesneedtoexplorethepatient’sperceptionsofpain,aswellastheirreportofexperiences.
Thetwoarenotquitethesame.Patientsmayreporttheirpaininavarietyofways,dependenton
thenatureandtheintensityofpainandthecontextinwhichitisfelt(e.g.whethertheyareever
distractedfromthepain).Theirperceptionofpainisalittlemorethoughanditincludesthe
meaningthatthepainhasforthem.Itincludesexplanationofwhythepainisthereinthefirstplace,
whatitindicatesabouttheirbodyandwhatitcouldsuggestmighthappeninthefuture(getting
better,gettingworse).Thenurseassessestheaccountofpainsharedbythepatient,andthismaybe
givenintheformofastory.Thisishowitbegan,thisishowitfelt,thisiswhatthatmeanttomeand
thisiswhatIdidaboutit(Mishleretal.2006)
InthisessayIexploretheassessmentofpainasconductedwithone60yearoldpatientwhomIwill
callMrsDrew.Whilsttheessaydescribesanassessmentofpainwithasinglepatient,Itrytoshare
toosomeideasandquestionsthatthisprovokeswithinmeaboutpainassessmentmoregenerally.
MrsDrewmademethinkaboutotherpatients,futureassessmentsandwhatIhadtodoasanurse
tohelppatients.TohelpstructurethisessayIusetheframeworkdescribedbyGibbs(1988).Whilst
theepisodeconcernedrelatesastageinMrsDrew’sillnesswhenshechallengedhertreatment
protocol,italsoincludessomeofthememoriesandthoughtsthatthispatientreferstoregarding
herearlierillnessandpastwaysofcopingwithpain.Inparticular,itpromptedmetoquestionto
whatextentIasanurseshouldrecommendanalgesia,drawingonwhatIhadbeentaughtaboutthe
effectivecontrolofpain.Ihadlearnedthatitwasbettertocontrolratherthantochasepain(e.g.
MannandCarr,2006;Forbes,2007).
MrsDrewwasdiagnosedwithlungcancerayearearlierandhadinitiallyhadherillnesstreatedby
chemotherapy.Thishadhelpedhertoachievearemissionthatlastedfornearlytenmonths(Huntet
al,2009describetheprognosisofthisdisease).Thecancerhadret urnedthoughandspreadtoher
12
spineanditwasherethatsheexperiencedmostofherpain.Itwasatthisstagethatthedoctors
explainedthathercarewouldnowbedirectedtowardshercomfortratherthanacure—towhich
shehadreplied,‘youmeanpalliativecare’.MrsDrewwassupportedathomebyherhusbandNeil
andvisitedonaregularbasisbycommunitybasednursestowhomIwasattachedaspartofmy
studentnursetraining.Shewasprescribedoralmorphineandcoulddecidewithinstatedlimitshow
manytabletsshecouldtakeinanyone24hourperiod.
Thesituation
IhadvisitedMrsDrewonseveraloccasionsovertheperiodofamonthwhenthecommunitynurse
andIwereconfrontedbyatearfulpatientwhoannouncedthatshedidnotwishtotaketheoral
opiatesquiteasoftenaswewererecommending.Asshespokesheheldherhusband’shandtightly,
lookingacrosstohimasshedescribedherexperiencesandfeelingsaboutthematter.Yes,therehad
beensomebadnightswhenthepainhadwokenherandshehadtositupandwatchtelevisionto
tryanddistractherself.Yes,sometimesthepainmadeherfeelnauseous,butshewasalarmedat
howfrequentlyshewastakingthe‘paintablets’andhowthismadeherfeelaboutherself.However
wellmeantthemedicationwas,itdidn’tfeeldignifiedtobesoreliantondrugs,orquitesosleepy
andunresponsiveforsuchahighpercentageoftheday.Whilsttheanalgesiawasworkingwellwhen
shetookthetablets,thequalityoflifewasn’twhatshewanted.
ThecommunitynurselistenedpatientlytoMrsDrewandthen explainedthatitwasnormaltohave
panicmomentsaboutsuchmedication.Morphinehadareputation,onethatpeopleassociated
withmisuseofdrugs,ratherthantheirtherapeuticuse.Usedonaregularbasis,thedrugwouldn’t
causeaddictionanditwouldprovideagreatdealofreassurancetoMrDrewaswell.Thecommunity
nursestatedthatshewasquitesurethatherespectedhiswife’sneedtosleepwhenshewishedand
tobuildtherhythmofthedayaroundherneeds.
AtthispointMrsDrewshookherhusband’shand,andsaid,‘tellher…tellherwhatwe’vetalked
about!’MrDrewthenexplainedthathiswifewasusedtodealingwithpain,shehadsuffered
recurrentpaininherneckandshoulderafteraroadtrafficaccidentsomeyearsbefore.Thepainhad
sometimesbeensevere,buthehadmassagedhershouldersandusedheatpacksthatshefound
soothing.Theyhaddecidedthattheywishedtousethistechniquenow,keepingthemorphinefor
absoluteemergencies,whenshewaslosingsleepandcouldn’teatasaresultofthediscomfort.
Thecommunitynurseassuredthemthattheywereinchargeoftheanalgesiaandwouldbeallowed
tomaketheirowndecisions.Shestartedtomakenotesthough,andannouncedthatshewas
makingareferraltothecancerpainclinic,somethingthatwouldhelpthemtotakestockofthe
situation.Therewasverygoodreasontosupposethatthismightbeaproblemassociatedwith
choosingtherightdosageofthemorphine,ratherthanusingsupplementalpainreliefmeasures.
MrsDrewrespondedsharply,‘You’renotlisteningtomethoughJane(thecommunitynurse’s
name—apseudonymisusedhere),Iwanttouseheatpacksinsteadofmorphine,atleast duringthe
day.Iwanttobemorealivewithmyhusband.’ThecommunitynurseassuredMrsDrewthatshe
hadheardwhatshehadsaidandrespectedherpointofview.Therewouldthoughbenothinglost
byusingtheclinictogainafurthercheckonthismatter.Withthatsheexcusedus,explainingthat
wehadafurtherappointmentthatmorningandweleft,havingcheckedthatMrsDrewhada
sufficientsupplyofherdifferentmedicines.
13
AswewalkedtothecarthecommunitynurseempathisedwithMrsDrew’splight,sayingthatifshe
hadlungcancershewouldprobablygraspatstrawstoo.Shewouldreachoutforthingsthatseemed
morenormal,andthenobserved,‘butthisisn’tnormalisit,thepainshehasisn’tnormal.It’snot
justawhiplashinjuryandoldage.’
Feelings
Irememberthatduringthisepisodefeelingamixtureofconfusion,surprise,angerandimpotence.
MrsDrewhadsurprisedmebythewayshehadspoken,usingwhatseemedtobeaplanned
announcement.Theyhadwaitedforandperhapsrehearsedthis moment.Nothinginmyexperience
todatehadpreparedmeforsuchanencounter,atleastinsuchcircumstances,whereweasnurses
weresoobviouslyworkingtosupportthepatient.ItwasonlylaterthatIcalledtheepisodea
confrontation.MrandMrsDrewhadconfrontedthecommunitynurseandIhadbeenthelargely
silentwitnesstotheevent.AsthediscussionproceededIremembermakingsupportivenoises,
remarkinghowusefulheatpackssometimeswereandglancingacrossatJane,whoseemedtobe
signallingwithherexpressionthatIshouldleavethis debatetoher.Iwastryingtoreadher
reactionstotheDrew’spointsandconcludedthatifIcouldn’tsupportherargumentstothepatient,
thenIshouldremainsilent.TherewereissuesherethatIperhapshadn’tenoughexperiencetodeal
with,atleast,whilst‘thinkingonmyfeet’.
Myinitialanger(withMrsDrewfornotacknowledgingallthatweweretryingtodo)quicklybecame
displacedtowardsmycolleagueJane.DuringtheeventIcouldn’texplainwhythatwas,but
afterwards,whenImadenotes,Irealisedthatitwasbecausesheseemedtohavesettheagendain
herownmindandtoberequiringthepatienttocomplywithconcernsofherown.Putrather
crudely,Janeseemedtobesaying,listenIknowaboutthesethings,thisisaphase,ananxiety;you
canworkthroughallthis.Ibelievedatthispointthatshehadmissedthesignificanceoftheevent,
thewayinwhichtheDrew’shadarrangedtheconversation.Forthem,thiswasnotaphaseatall,
butaconsideredandveryimportantdecision,onethattheywantedthenursestoaccept
(Freshwater,2002andEdwardsandElwyn,2009emphasizetheimportanceofnegotiatedcare
planning).
Myfeelingsofimpotencewereassociatedstronglywithmylackofclinicalexperience.Ihavemet
thisbefore.NomatterhowmanyplacementsIdo,nomatterhowgoodthementoringIreceive,I
keepmeetingsituationswhereIamunsureabouthowtorespondnext.Ifeelyounger,less
knowledgeablethanIshouldbeatthisstageinmytraining.Iwanttoreassurepatients,tosupport
colleaguesandtogivegoodadvice,butthereisnotenoughconfidencetodothat.IfIfeltunsettled
anduncertainaboutJane’sresponsetotheDrew’s,rightthenIcouldn’teasilyexplainthat.I
couldn’tofferasecondopinion,couldn’tsuggestanideathatmighthelpsupportthepatient.Tomy
annoyanceIcouldn’tmanagethateitherasweleftthehouse.Janehadmadesomefairpoints,she
clearlyseemedconcernedaboutthepatient’sneeds,butperhapsshehadn’tspottedtheright
need—forMrsDrewtodetermineingreaterparthowshedealtwithherillness.
Experienceevaluated
Afterwards,this shortepisodeprompteddoubtsanddebatesaboutseveralimportantaspectsof
nursingforme.Settingasidetheetiquetteoflearninginclinicalpractice,notchallengingaqualified
nurseinfrontofapatient,therewereproblemshereassociatedwithsupportingpatientdignity,
14
withmyassumptionsrelatingtoanalgesiaandpaincontrolstrategies,andIrealised,withmy
assumptionsabouttypesofpainandwhohadtheexpertisetodefinethese.
Dignityismorethansimplyusingtheappropriatetermsofaddress,protectingtheprivacyof
patientsandattendingtotheirexpressedconcerns(Price,2004).Itisaboutclarifyingthewaysin
whichtheyliveandaccommodateillnessortreatment.Itisaboutfindingoutwhatbenchmarksthey
usetosaythat‘yes,Iamdoingwellhere,thismakesmefeelgoodaboutmyself’.Uponreflection,I
sensethatweonthisoccasionhadnotworkedhardenoughtodiscoverhowMrandMrsDrew
definequalityoflife,orbeinginchargeoftheirsituation.Weweremoreconcernedwithproviding
resources,sharingresearchortheoryaboutmedicationandquestioningthefamiliarmisconceptions
associatedwithmorphine.Toputitsimply,wewere‘missingatrick’,readingtheencounteras
somethingthathadhappenedmanytimesbefore—thereportofproblemsoranxieties,arequestfor
help,ratherthanadecisionthatthepatientandhercarerhadalreadycometo.Readingsituations
wellseemed,withthebenefitofhindsight,tobethefirstbasisfordignifiedcare.‘Whatishappening
here,whatwillhelpthepatientmost?’werequestionsthatweperhapsassumedthatwealready
knewtheanswerto.
IrealisedthatinmytrainingIhadalreadyacceptedtheargumentthatpatientswouldwishto
remainpainfreecomewhatmayandthatthetacklingoffearsaboutprospectivepain,was
somethingthatnursesengagedin.Iassumedthatbecausecancerpainrepresentedsuchamajor
threat,becauseitwasgreaterandmoreallencompassing,thattherewaslittleornodoubtthatit
shouldberemoved.Whatwassounsettling,andtooksomuchtimetoexamine,wasthatMrsDrew
acknowledgedthepossibleseverityofmetastaticcancerpain,butthatshestillpreferredtorespond
toitusingmeasuresthathadworkedforherwhiplashneckinjury.MrsDrewwaswillingtotradeoff
apainfreestateforsomethingthatgaveheragreatersenseofcontrolandwhichperhapsenabled
herhusbandtoexpresshissupportforherinaverytangibleway(preparingheatpacks,massaging
herback,ratherthansimplygivingherthetablets).MrandMrsDrewquestionedallmyassumptions
aboutbestanalgesiapractice,andseemedtowritealargequestionmarkonthetextbooksIhad
readaboutchasingratherthancontrollingpaininpalliativecaresituations(MannandCarr,2006).
Reflections(learningopportunities)
TheepisodewithMrsDrewleftmeuncomfortablebecausemypastapproachtopainmanagement
wastheoretical.I(andIbelieveJanetoo)regularlymadeuseofsciencetodecidewhatcouldbe
doneasregardspainreliefandtoassumethatpatientswouldwishtoachieveallofthosebenefits.
Thiswasn’taboutlocalapplicationsofheatversusmorphine,MrsDrewcoulduseboth,itwasabout
choiceandhowpatientsmadechoices—whytheyreachedthedecisionsthattheydid.Itwasforme,
aboutacceptingverypersonally,thatprovidingthatpatientsaregivenalltherelevantfacts,alerted
totheoptions,thattheyreallyareabletomakechoicesthatworkforthem.TheveryfactthatMrs
Drew'sillnesswasnowincurable,thatsheandherhusbandusuallytackledpaintogether,meant
thathersolutiontothechallengewasdifferenttothosethatmanyotherpatientsarrivedat.Having
dealtwiththispainforsometime,knowingthatitcouldandprobablywouldgetworse,meantthat
shewasbetterequippedthanotherlessexperiencedpatientstomakeadecisionhere.
Thistooknothingawayfromthebenefitsofsharingfurtherdiscussionwithpainclinicexperts.I
thought,MrsDrewwillstandherground,shewillinsistondoingthingsherwayifherhusbandis
15
strongtoo.Whatitdidhighlightthoughwastheimportanceoflisteningtopatients,hearinghow
theyperceivepain,howtheynarratenotonlythepainbutwhattheydidaboutit.Inthisinstance
thenarrationwasallaboutdignity,andcoping,andfindingwaystohelponeanotherandhowthis
enablesustofeelinthefaceofsuchaterribleillness.So,intellingusaboutherpain,whatshedid
aboutit,usingmorphinewhenitwas‘absolutelyrequired’,MrsDrewwasnotreportingher
ignoranceof whatcouldbeachievedifthemedicationwasuseddifferently,butwhatshepreferred
todoasitenabledhertoachievedifferentgoals.MrsDrew’sgoalswereaboutliveliness,alertness
andstoicism,showingthatshecouldbearatleastameasureofpain.
IwonderedwhyIhadn’tlistenedcarefullyenoughtosuchastory?Wasitbecauseoftimepressure,
orperhapscomplacency,thatJaneandIfeltthatwealreadyknewwhataccountwouldbeshared?
Didwethinkthatthepatientwouldaskforhelp,morehelp,asthepaincontinued?Ifso,thenour
guesseshadpromptedustobehaveasexperts,andproblemsolvers,onthepatient’sbehalf.
Perhapshearingapatientnarrativeisaboutdiscoveringwhatsortofroletheywouldlikeyo uto
fulfil.Ifso,thenitmightbeadifficultrole.IthoughthardabouthowhardthiswasforJane.Shewas
goingtobeaskedtowitnessMrsDrew’sfuturepain,onethatwasnowlessperfectlycontrolled.She
wasgoingtobeaskedtoreassure,tosuggestmeasuresthatmighthelp,withoutremindingthe
patientthatshe‘alreadyknewthatyoucouldn’tmanagepainthatway!’WhenIthinkaboutitnow,
thatisverystressfulforanurse.Itisaboutcaringandallowingpatient’stomakechoicesthatwe
personallymightnotmake.
Conclusions
Ihavedrawnthenthreeconclusionsfromtheabovereflection.
First,thatbeingpatientcentredisnevereasyandrequiresreallisteningandinterpretationskills.My
criticismofwhatJanechosetodo,totryanddissuadeMrsDrewfromacourseofaction,
recommendingfurtherappraisalofthesituation,isaneasyonetomake.Nursesconfrontsituations
suchasthisrelativelyunpreparedandreactasconsideratelyaspossible.Itiseasyinhindsightto
recommendotherresponses,afurtherexplorationofwhatmotivatedMrsDrew’spainmanagement
preferences.
Second,thatexperiencecanbeavaluableteacher,theequaloftextbooks.Ifnursesareinterestedin
care,thenweshouldbeconcernedwiththesensethatpatientsmakeoftheirownillness,the
treatmentorsupportthattheyreceive.Weneedtounderstandwhatpatientshavetoteachusand
havetoacknowledgethatthismeansthatwewon’talwaysseemincontrolourselves,expertand
knowledgeable.Ourexpertisemightbeelsewhere,helpingpatientstoreachtheirowndecisions.
Third,thatonewaytounderstandpatientperspectivesonillnessortreatment,onpainmanagement
inthisexample,istohearhowtheytalkaboutthesituation.Howdotheydescribethepain,howdo
theyrefertowhattheydidaboutit?Thewayinwhich thestoryisshared,howwecoped,howthis
madeusfeel,isasimportantasthefactsrelated.Sometimesapatientneedstofeelstalwart,even
heroicinthefaceofillness.
16
Futurecare
Itwouldbefoolishandunprofessionaltorecommen dto otherpatientsthattheymightnotwishto
removepain,orthatovercomingpaindoesn’talwaysmeanwedon’tcontinuetoexperienceit.For
everyMrsDrewtheremaybemanyotherpatientswhowouldwelcomethecompleteremovalof
pain,sothattheycandiecalmly,quietly,withtheirownversionofdignity.Butitdoesseemtome,
thatitwillbeworththinkingaboutthediversityofpatientsandhowtheyprefertocopewhenI
assesspainandhelpmanagethisprobleminthefuture.Iwon’tbeabletowalkawayfromthe
responsibilityofdebatingwhetherIhaveexplainedallthatIcould,detailedthestrengthsand
limitationsofdifferentwaysofcoping.Iwillneedtofindreflectiontimetoponderwhatpatients
havesaidandifnecessarytogobackandsay,‘I’vebeenthinkingsomemoreaboutyourwordslast
week..’knowingthatthisdoesn’tmakemeanythelessprofessional.
References
Edwards,AandElwyn,G(2009)Shareddecisionmakinginhealthcare:achievingevidencebased
patientchoice,2
nd
ed.Oxford,OxfordUniversityPress
Forbes,K(2007)Opiodsincancerpain,Oxford,OxfordUniversityPress
Freshwater,D(2002)Therapeuticnursing:improvingpatientcarethroughselfawareness,London,
Sage.
GibbsG(1988)Learningbydoing:aguidetoteachingandlearningmethods,Oxford,Oxford
PolytechnicFurtherEducationunit
Hunt,I.,Muers,MandTreasure,T(2009)ABCoflungcancer,Oxford,WileyBlackwell/BMJBooks
Mann,EandCarr,E(2006)Painmanagement,Oxford,Blackwell
McCaffery,MandPasero,C(1999)Pain:Clinicalmanual,Mosby,Philadelphia
Mishler,E.,Rapport,FandWainwright,P (2006)Theselfinhealthandillness:patients,professionals
andnarrativeidentity,Oxford,RadcliffePublishingLtd
Price,B(2004)Demonstratingrespectforpatientdignity,NursingStandard,19(12),4551
17
OurNotes
Thefollowingnotesofferpointsonthedesignofthisessaybutdonotconstituteamarkingofthe
work.Thenotesaredesignedtohelpyouidentifykeyfeaturesofthework.
Characteristicsofreflectiveessaywriting
Raymet’sworkischaracteristicofreflectivewritinginnursing,inparticular:
Appropriateuseofthefirstpersonsingular(I).Thesearereflectionsofthenurseherself.To
writeinthethirdperson(thenurse)couldbecomeconfusingandinauthentic.
Useofareflectiveframework(itisnotbeyondpossibility
touseaframeworkofyourown
design,butthosetriedandtestedbeforehavemuchtocommendthem.Youarelikelyto
covermaterialmoreevenlyandtodemonstrateadeeperanalysisusingthese).
Explorationoffeelings,attitudesandvalues(theseareusedbynursestointerpretcare
requirementsandtoplaninterventions).
Descriptionofacasestudycareepisode(dispassionateandsuccinct).
Limitedreferencetotheliterature(thefocushereisuponexperienceandthemeaningsthat
mightbearrivedatthroughreflectionuponthesame.Referencestotheliteratureare
importantbywayofillustration
oraspartofacomparisonoftheoryandpractice,butthe
argumentswithintheessayarenotjustifiedbytheliterature.Theyarerecommendedtothe
readerintermsofexperiencedescribedandwhattheysuggestasregardsthenurse's
introspection).
Patients/colleaguesrenderedanonymous(throughpseudonyms).
Introduction
Whilstmanyreflectivepracticeessaysgostraightintothedescriptionofthesituationwe
recommendanintroductionthatsetsupthepurposeoftheessayandwhichhelpsthereaderto
anticipatewhatwillappearbelow.Inreflectivewritingthisusuallyreferstoajourney,aprocessof
enquiry.HereRaymet
conveysthisveryclearlyandacknowledgessomethingofwhatshehas
alreadyrealisedthroughtheprocessofnotemakingandessaydrafting.Inthiscase,thatisthat
patientcentredcareandassessmentofpainareaboutnarratives,thewaysinwhichaccountsare
sharedbythepatientaswell
aswhatisreported.Werethisanessayabouttheory,Raymetmight
stateacaseatthebeginningofheressay.Noticethesignpostingwithinthissection,Raymet
explainshowshewilluseGibbs(1988)reflectiveframework.Thisisimportantasotherwisewe
mightexpecttoseethesection‘conclusions’come
lastinthewrittenwork.
18
Thesituation
Inreflectivewritingitisimportanttobeclearwhenyouarewritingaboutfactsandwhenyou are
referringtoperspectivesandexperiences.Inthissectionthefocusisuponfactsandsothewritingis
succinctanddescriptive,reportingthatwhichhappenedandwhichispertinenttotherest
ofthe
paper.Raymetavoidssurmisingthemeaningofwhathashappened,forinstancethechangeinMrs
Drew’sprognosis.Welearnwhatthepatientandherhusbandsaid,gainasummaryofwhatthe
communitynursesaidandarelefttoourselvesreflectonwhatthissignifiesaboutMrs
Drew,about
thepainassessmentandaboutthecarerelationshipinthiscontext.Ratherlikeapoliceofficer,
reportinginformationfromaroadtrafficaccident,thefactsratherthaninterpretationsand
speculationsaresharedhere.
Towritethissectionitisnecessarytodecidewhatispertinentandwhatisnot.
Youmightconsider
thatweneededmore detailaboutthemedicationused,howlongMrsDrewhadbeenprescribed
opiates,thedosageandthepatternofuse.Itcouldbevaluabletolearnsomethingaboutpastpain
assessmentsandtolearnwhetherthepatienthadkeptapaindiary.Nonetheless,
thesectioniswell
conceivedasitfocusespreciselyupontheissuesthatareupfordebate,thatis,whoshould
determinehowbesttojudgepainandthenhowtomanageit.Itisthisrelationshipbetweencare
philosophies,respectforthepatientaspartnerincaredecisions,andthe
nurse'seagernessto
relievesufferingwhichisatissuehere.
InapreviousdraftofsuchanessayRaymetmightnothaveachievedsuchaclearfocus.Draftingthe
reflectiveessaycanitselfimprovereflection,promptingsecondandthirdthoughts.Ajudgementhas
tobemadethenbetweenworkingand
reworkingessaystoimproveclarityandtransformingthem
intotheory,therebylosingsomeofthefreshnessofthefirstwork.WethinkthatRaymethasfound
ahappybalancehere.
Feelings
InthissectionRaymetwritesaboutherfeelings.Shedoesnotsurmisewhatthoseofotherpeople
mightbeandwereshetodoso,itwouldhavetobeclearthatsheisspeculating.Akeypartof
reflectivewritingistoexplorehowourfeelingsmightfilterexperienceof
careepisodesandaffect
perceptionsofwhathappened(asgood,bad,indifferent).Thiscanbeadifficultelementofwriting
becauseyoumighthavetoownuptosomeuncomfortableemotions.Abalancehastobestruck
betweenselfcritiqueandcompassion,recognisingwhysuchemotionscanarise.Noticehow
Raymet
identifiesthekeyfeelingsinthefirstparagraphher eandreviewseachinturnusingthefollowing
paragraphs.Thisisaclearandmethodicalwaytoproceed.Wecanseenotonlywhatemotions
occurredbuthowthefocusoftheseshifted.Thisdemonstratesacarefulconsiderationofemotions
on
herpart.Shedoesnotassumethatemotionsareright,justifiedorselfevident.Thereisno
crusadehereregardinghowcareshouldbe.
19
Experienceevaluated
Itispossibleforstudentstoconflatethenexttwoselectionsandtorepeatthemselves,butRaymet
avoidsthathere,treatingthissectionasasummaryofwhattheepisodemeansandthenextsection
asanindicationofwhatneedstobeexploredfurther,withregardtoassessmentanddialogue
with
patients.Thissectionisverymuchreflectiononactionandaboutarrivingatameasuredjudgement
ofhowtheepisodecanbecharacterized.ForRaymetitisaboutatensionbetweenphilosophy(care
thatenablespatientstofeeldignified)andaboutmentalsetandtheory(thewaysinwhich
nurses
habituallyapproachcaresituationsandusetheorytoanticipatehowbesttoact).Itiscarethatwas
lesssuccessfulthanitcouldbe.Shereviewstheissuesbriefly,butconveysinsightsintowhynurses
behaveastheydo.It’sworthconsideringhere(andlater)whetheryouthinkthatRaymet
showsa
dueregardforJanetheCommunityNurseandherpredicament.Doyouthinkthatshesimplyjudges
Jane,orwhethersheshowsadueunderstandingofwhyhercolleaguemightbeoperatinginamore
ritualorfamiliarway?NoticeRaymet’sobservationthat‘weweremissingatrick’.
Thiscouldseem
rathercolloquialwriting,butitdoesconveycrisplyhowRaymetsawthis,asalostopportunity.
Reflections(learningopportunities)
Thisispossiblythemostpowerfulsectionoftheessay,andonethatisconveyedverylucidly.
Raymetreturnstothereflectionsometimelaterandbeginstoaskquestionsaboutwhysheandher
colleaguefailedtoreadthecareepisodesuccessfully.Suchlaterstagethinkingisimportantif
reflective
practiceepisodesaretohelpthenurseidentifyusefulwaysofthinkingabouthealthcare,
patternsofwhatitisimportanttoconsiderwhenmakingcaredecisions.Itisnotsimplythatthe
nursesdidnotlistenlongenough,itwasthattheylistenedtothereportedfactsinthepatient’s
account,butnothowtheaccountwasarranged.Raymethereisusingsometeachingweshared
aboutpatientnarrativesandthepropensityofusalltotellstoriesabouteventsthatgivemeaningto
whathappened.Forexample,wetellstoriesaboutatriptothedentist.Thesereportwhatwas
done
(Ihadafilling)butmayalsoindicatesomethingaboutourbravery,thecostoftreatment,guiltabout
eatingtoomanysweetsandmuchmore!Peopleusestoriestoconveythemeaningsofeventsto
othersandtoelicitresponsesfromus,thelisteners.Inthisinstance,MrsDrew
mighthavebeen
lookingforapproval,supportandconsultationonherplantomanagepaindifferently.Instead,Jane
treateditasareportoffalteringconfidenceinpainmanagementandsuggestedthatreinforcement
mighthelp(thecancerpainclinic).
Conclusions
Raymetusesbulletpointshereandthesecanbeeffective,providingthattheyhelpyousummarise
informationthathasbeeneitheraddressedelsewhereorwhichisincidentaltothemainarguments
ofthepaper.Routineuseofbulletpointscanmakeyouressaylookalittletoonotational,souse
them
sparingly!
Theconclusionsneedtosumuptheprecedingreflectionsandyourdeliberationsonthesame.
Raymetachievesthathere,showingempathytowardshercommunitynursecolleague(thiswork
20
isn’teasy),insightintopatientcentredcareandapossiblewayofthinkingaboutwhatpatientssay
(narratives)thatmightassisthertoworkdifferentlyinthefuture.
Futurecare
ThisisquiteashortlastsectionfromRaymetandyoushouldavoidrunningoutofsteambyplanning
yourworksothatanadequateproportionofwordsareallocatedthere.Itcanbedifficulttodecide
whatnext,afteryouhavereachedconclusionsintheprevioussection.Hereitis
necessarytoavoid
soundingtrite(‘Iwilllistentoandhearallpatients’narrativesinthefutureandactaccordingly’)and
tobeclearaboutwhatcouldrepresentanextstep.Inthisinstancethatcouldbethingssuchas
identifyingoneormorefuturecasestudieswhereyoutry
tohearpatientaccountsmoreclearly,
testingyourinterpretationwithothers.Itmightbetoreadmoreaboutpatientnarrativesandtheir
role,sothatideascanbeevaluatedfurther.Raymet’s‘futurecareisappropr iatelymeasuredin
tone,butitlacksalittledetailaswell.