Commercial Space Transportation:
2011 Year in Review
COMMERCIAL SPACE
TRANSPORTATION:
2011 YEAR IN REVIEW
January 2012
HQ-121525.INDD
• i •
2011 Year in Review
About the Ofce of Commercial Space Transportation
e Federal Aviation Administrations Oce of Commercial Space
Transportation (FAA/AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch
and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites,
as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle
V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act).
FAA/ASTs mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of
property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the
United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA/
AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches
and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation
can be found on FAA/ASTs web site at
http://www.faa.gov/about/oce_org/headquarters_oces/ast/.
NOTICE
Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not
constitute an ocial endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either
expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration.
Cover: Art by John Sloan (2012)
• ii •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
CONTENTS
Introduction ............................................1
Executive Summary
......................................2
2011 Launch Activity
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
WORLDWIDE ORBITAL LAUNCH ACTIVITY  3
Worldwide Launch Revenues  5
Worldwide Orbital Payload Summary  5
Commercial Launch Payload Summaries  6
Non-Commercial Launch Payload Summaries  7
US AND FAA-LICENSED ORBITAL LAUNCH ACTIVITY  9
FAA-Licensed Orbital Launch Summary  9
US and FAA-Licensed Orbital Launch Activity in Detail                   9
FAA Reentry License Summary  12
INTERNATIONAL ORBITAL LAUNCH ACTIVITIES                        12
FAA SUBORBITAL FLIGHT SUMMARY                                  15
2011 Space Transportation Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
FIVE-YEAR WORLDWIDE SPACE TRANSPORTATION TRENDS              16
COMMERCIAL SATELLITE AND LAUNCH TRENDS  18
INTERNATIONALLY COMPETED LAUNCHES                           19
2012 Launch Activity Projection ...........................20
Appendix I: 2011 Worldwide Orbital Launch Events
...........22
Appendix II: 2012 Projected Worldwide Orbital Launch Events
26
Appendix III: Denitions
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30
• 1 •
2011 Year in Review
INTRODUCTION
e Commercial Space Transportation: 2011 Year in Review summarizes U.S. and
international launch activities for calendar year 2011. is report also provides a
review and analysis of the past ve years of commercial launch activity.
ere were 84 orbital launch events worldwide in 2011, including commercial, civil,
and military missions. Appendix I contains the details of these events. Appendix II
details the rst six-month projection of worldwide orbital launches for 2012.
e Federal Aviation Administrations Oce of Commercial Space Transportation
(FAA/AST) licensed one commercial orbital launch in 2011, compared to four
licensed launches in 2010. e license was for the launch of Sea Launch AG’s Zenit
3SL rocket in September.
Appendix III provides denitions for the terminology of this report.
• 2 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Of the 84 worldwide orbital launch attempts in 2011, 18 (21 percent) were
commercial. is is a decrease in commercial launches from 2010, when there
were 23 commercial orbital launches worldwide out of a total of 74 launches (see
Figure 1). Much of this decrease stems from the fact that none of the vehicles
manufactured by the United States had
any commercial launches in 2011. Four
commercial launches planned for 2011
under NASAs Commercial Resupply
Services (CRS) and Commercial Orbital
Transportation Services (COTS)
programs were delayed until 2012.
Russia had 56 percent of the
international commercial launch market
with 10 commercial launches in 2011.
Sea Launch AG had two commercial
launches accounting for 11 percent of
the commercial launch market. e return-to-ight launch from the Pacic Ocean
was the only FAA/AST-licensed orbital launch this year. Sea Launch carried out its
second launch out of Baikonur, Kazakhstan as part of the Land Launch program.
Europe attained a 22 percent market share, conducting four commercial Ariane
5 launches. China had two commercial launches of its Long March 3B vehicle,
attaining 11 percent of the international commercial market.
Of the 84 orbital launches attempted worldwide, 6 were failures, including 1 failed
commercial launch. Four of the failures were Russian launches on three dierent
launch vehicles:
• A Rockot launch vehicle failed to place the GEO IK-2 No. II remote sensing
satellite in low Earth orbit (LEO) on February 1.
• A Proton M launch vehicle failed to put the Express AM4 into geosynchronous
orbit (GEO) on August 17 (this was the commercial launch failure in 2011).
• A Soyuz launch vehicle failed to carry the Progress M-12M supply capsule to
the International Space Station (ISS) on August 24.
• A Soyuz 2 1B launch vehicle failed to launch the Meridian 5 communications
satellite to a Molniya orbit on December 23.
e United States and China each experienced one launch failure in 2011. A
Taurus XL vehicle failed to launch NASAs Earth science satellite, Glory, and three
university satellites on March 4. On August 18, a Long March 2C failed to place
Chinas Shijian 11-04 experimental satellite into sun-synchronous orbit (SSO).
Two suborbital ights were conducted under FAA permits in 2011. Both were
conducted by Blue Origin, using the PM-2 vehicle.
18
66
Non-Commercial Launches
Commercial Launches
Figure 1. 2011 Total Worldwide Launch Activity
• 3 •
2011 Year in Review
2011 LAUNCH ACTIVITY
WORLDWIDE ORBITAL LAUNCH ACTIVITY
is section highlights worldwide launch
activity in 2011. Launches, payloads, and
revenue streams are on a country-by-country
basis. Launch providers from the United
States, Russia, Europe, China, Japan, India,
Iran, and one multinational provider
conducted a total of 84 launch events in
2011, 18 of which were commercial (see
Tables 1 and 2 and Figures 2 and 3). e
following is a summary of all the 2011
worldwide commercial launches by country:
• e United States had 18 launches, 3
more than in 2010, but no commercial
launches.
• Russia led in both total orbital (31) and commercial launches (10). Russia
also experienced the highest number of failures (4). One failure was for a
commercial launch.
• Europe conducted seven launches in 2011, four of which were commercial
launches. e rst two Soyuz 2 launches from French Guiana happened in
2011.
• China had 19 launches, 2 of which were commercial. China did not conduct
any commercial launches in 2010.
• e multinational Sea Launch Zenit 3SL launch vehicle returned to ight in
September. e company had two commercial launches, one FAA-licensed
launch from a platform in the Pacic Ocean and the other from Baikonur,
Kazakhstan as part of the Land Launch program.
Appendix I shows all 84 orbital launches worldwide in 2011, including commercial,
civil, and military missions.
Table 1. 2011 Worldwide Orbital Launch Events
Commercial
Launches
Non-
Commercial
Launches
Total
Launches
United States 0 18 18
Russia 10 21 31
Europe 4 3 7
China 2 17 19
Japan 0 3 3
India 0 3 3
Iran 0 1 1
Multinational 2 0 2
TOTAL 18 66 84
Figure 2. 2011 Worldwide Commercial Launch Activity
Europe
4 (22%)
Russia
10 (56%)
Multinational
2 (11%)
Total: 18 Commercial Launches
China
2 (11%)
Total: 18 Commercial Launches
Figure 3. 2011 Total Worldwide Launch Activity
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
United States Russia Europe China Japan India Iran Multinational
Number of Launchess
Non-commercial
Commercial
Non-Commercial
Commercial
• 4 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
Table 2. 2011 Worldwide Commercial Launch Events
Date Vehicle
Launching
Country/
Region
Payload(s) Orbit
Launch
Outcome
22-Apr-11 Ariane 5 ECA Europe Yahsat 1A
Intelsat New Dawn
GEO
GEO
Success
Success
20-May-11 Proton M Russia Telstar 14R GEO Success
20-May-11 Ariane 5 ECA Europe Insat 4G/GSAT-8
ST 2
GEO
GEO
Success
Success
13-Jul-11 Soyuz 2 Russia Globalstar 2nd Gen 07
Globalstar 2nd Gen 08
Globalstar 2nd Gen 09
Globalstar 2nd Gen 10
Globalstar 2nd Gen 11
Globalstar 2nd Gen 12
NGSO
NGSO
NGSO
NGSO
NGSO
NGSO
Success
Success
Success
Success
Success
Success
15-Jul-11 Proton M Russia SES-3
KazSat 2
GEO
GEO
Success
Success
06-Aug-11 Ariane 5 ECA Europe Astra 1N
BSAT-3c/JCSAT-110R
GEO
GEO
Success
Success
17-Aug-11 Dnepr M Russia Sich 2
NX
Nigeriasat 2
Edusat
RASAT
BPA 2
Aprizesat 5
Aprizesat 6
NGSO
NGSO
NGSO
NGSO
NGSO
NGSO
NGSO
NGSO
Success
Success
Success
Success
Success
Success
Success
Success
17-Aug-11 Proton M Russia Express AM4 GEO Failure
21-Sep-11 Ariane 5 ECA Europe Arabsat 5C
SES-2
GEO
GEO
Success
Success
24-Sep-11 Zenit 3SL Multinational Atlantic Bird 7 GEO Success
29-Sep-11 Proton M Russia QuetzSat-1 GEO Success
06-Oct-11 Zenit 3SL Multinational Intelsat 18 GEO Success
07-Oct-11 Long March 3B
China Eutelsat W3C GEO Success
19-Oct-11 Proton M Russia Viasat 1 GEO Success
25-Nov-11 Proton M Russia Asiasat 7 GEO Success
11-Dec-11 Proton M Russia Luch 5A
Amos 5
GEO
GEO
Success
Success
19-Dec-11 Long March 3B China NigComSat 1R GEO Success
28-Dec-11 Soyuz 2 Russia Globalstar 2nd Gen 13
Globalstar 2nd Gen 14
Globalstar 2nd Gen 15
Globalstar 2nd Gen 16
Globalstar 2nd Gen 17
Globalstar 2nd Gen 18
NGSO
NGSO
NGSO
NGSO
NGSO
NGSO
Success
Success
Success
Success
Success
Success
• 5 •
2011 Year in Review
Worldwide Launch Revenues
Revenues from the 18 commercial launch events in 2011 amount to an estimated
$1.9 billion, a decrease of $526 million from 2010 (see Figure 4). e following are
the revenues by country:
• e United States did not generate any
commercial launch revenue.
• Russian commercial launch revenues were
approximately $707 million.
• European revenues were approximately
$880 million.
• Chinese revenues were approximately $140
million.
• Multinational revenues were approximately
$200 million.
Payments for launch services typically are spread over one to two years before the
launch. For the purposes of this report, revenue is in the year a customer’s payload
launches. Launch revenues go to the country of the primary vehicle manufacturer.
e assessment of these revenues uses commercial launch price estimates for each
launch vehicle, from publically available information.
Most launch vehicles today are manufactured, sold, and launched by the same
organization entirely in one country or, in the case of Europe and the former Soviet
Union,
1
within a particular economic region. At present, there is one launch
service corporation, Sea Launch, that is characterized as multinational.
Worldwide Orbital Payload Summary
In 2011, 84 launches carried
a total of 133 payloads into
orbit (see Table 3 and Figures
5 and 6). Of the 133 payloads,
35 provide commercial
services (see Figure 7 for these
payloads by launch country).
e remaining 98 payloads
were used for non-commercial
civil government, military, or
non-prot purposes.
1 International Launch Services (ILS) and Arianespace constitute an exception. ILS is a Russian-owned
company incorporated in the U.S. and selling launches of the Russian Proton vehicles. Arianespace
markets launches of a Russian-manufactured Soyuz 2 type launch vehicle from the Kourou launch site in
French Guiana.
Commercial
Payloads
Non-
Commercial
Payloads
Total
Payloads
United States 0 28 28
Russia 21 32 53
Europe 8 9 17
China 4 17 21
Japan 0 3 3
India 0 8 8
Iran 0 1 1
Multinational 2 0 2
TOTAL 35 98 133
Table 3. Payloads Launched by Country in 2011
Figure 4. Approximate 2011 Commercial Launch Revenues
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
$1,000
United States Russia Europe China Multinational
$0
$707
$880
$140
$200
US$ Millions
• 6 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
Commercial Launch Payload Summaries
Eighteen commercial launches carried a total of 41 commercial and non-
commercial payloads into orbit. irty-ve of the payloads were communications
satellites; only two of those satellites were government communications satellites,
and the rest were commercial communications satellites.
Eight payloads were for civil government purposes. Government payloads are
oen remote sensing or science satellites. See Table 4 for a summary of government
payloads launched commercially.
Twenty of these 41 commercially launched
payloads are non-geosynchronous orbit (NGSO)
satellites, and 21 are GEO satellites. See Table 2
(p. 4) for which payloads are launched to NGSO
or GEO orbit.
Seventeen of the 18 commercial launches were
successful. On August 17, the Proton M launch
vehicle failed to launch the Express AM4 Russian
communications satellite to GEO.
Table 4. Commercially Launched Government Civil Payloads
Launch Vehicle Payload Service Type Use
Proton M KazSat 2 Civil Communications
Dnepr
Sich 2 Civil Remote Sensing
NX Civil Remote Sensing
Nigeriasat 2 Civil Remote Sensing
Edusat Civil Science
RASAT Civil Science
BPA 2 Civil Development
Proton M Luch 5A Civil Communications
Figure 6. Total Payloads Launched by Country in 2011
United States
28 (21%)
Multinational
2 (2%)
Iran
1 (1%)
India
8 (6%)
China
21 (16%)
Europe
17 (13%)
Russia
53 (40%)
Japan
3 (2%)
Total: 133 payloads launched
Figure 7. Commercial Payloads Launched by Country in 2011
Europe
8 (23%)
Russia
21 (60%)
Multinational
2 (6%)
China
4 (11%)
Total: 35 commercial payloads launched
Total: 35 commercial payloads launched
Figure 5. 2011 Total Worldwide Launch Activity by Payload
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
United States Russia Europe China Japan India Iran Multinational
Number of Payloadss
Non-commercial
Commercial
Non-Commercial
Commercial
• 7 •
2011 Year in Review
Non-Commercial Launch Payload Summaries
In 2011, there were 66 non-commercial launches carrying a total of 92 commercial
and non-commercial payloads. Two of these payloads were commercial
communications satellites: Chinasat 10 and Paksat 1R. e remaining 90 payloads
were for civil government, military, or non-prot use (see Figure 8).
Table 5 provides a list of non-
commercial payloads launched
for civil government, military, or
non-prot use, including:
• Forty-six payloads launched
non-commercially for civil
government purposes.
• irty-four payloads were
for military use.
• Ten payloads launched non-
commercially for non-prot
missions.
Table 5. Payloads Launched Non-Commercially by Service Type
Country Service Type Payload(s)
United
States
Civil (10)
3 Space Shuttle missions (STS-133, 134, and 135); Glory; SAC-D/Aquarius; Juno; GRAIL A and B; NPP;
and MSL
Military (9) NRO L-27, L-34, L-49, and L-66; X-37B OTV 2; SBIRS GEO 1; ORS 1; Navstar GPS 2F-02; and TacSat 4
Non-Prot (9) Kysat 1; Hermes; Explorer 1 (PRIME); RAX; M-Cubed; AS-1; Explorer 1 (PRIME) Unit 2; DICE 1 and 2
Russia
Civil (12)
Electro-L N1; Progress M-09M, -10M, -11M, 12M, -13M; Soyuz TMA-02M, -03M, -21, -22; Spektr R; and
Phobos-Grunt
Military (11)
Cosmos 2472 and 2473; Glonass K1-1; Glonass M42, M43, M44, M45, and M46; Meridian 4 and 5;
and GEO IK-2 No. II
Europe
Civil (4) ATV2; Galileo 1 and 2; and Pleiades HR 1
Military (5) ELISA 1 through 4; and SSOT
China
Civil (12)
Shijian 11-02, -03, and -04; Tianlian-1B; HY-2A; Tiangong 1; Shenzhou 8; Chuang Xing 1-03; Ziyuan
1-2C; Yinghuo-1; Shiyan Wexing 4; and Tianxun 1
Military (6) Beidou 2 IGS 3, 4, and 5; Chinasat 1A; Yaogan 12 and 13
Japan
Civil (1) HTV-2
Military (2) IGS-4C (Optical) and IGS-4B (Radar)
India
Civil (7) X-Sat; Resourcesat 2; GSAT 12; Jugnu; SRMSAT; Vesslesat 1; and Megha Tropiques
Non-Prot (1) Youthsat
Iran Military (1) Rasad 1
Figure 8. Payloads by Service Type Deployed By
Non-Commercial Launches
Government
Military
34 (37%)
Government
Civil
46 (50%)
Commercial
Communications
2 (2%)
Non-Prot
10 (11%)
• 8 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
Sixty-one non-commercial launches were successful. e following ve non-
commercial launches failed:
• A Rockot launch vehicle carrying the GEO IK-2 No. II, a Russian SSO geodetic
satellite, failed on February 1.
• A Taurus XL launch vehicle failed to launch NASAs Glory scientic satellite,
along with the Kaysat 1, Hermes, and Explorer 1 (PRIME) satellites, on March 4.
• e Long March 2C launch carrying Shijian 11-04, a Chinese scientic SSO
satellite, failed on August 18.
• A Soyuz launch vehicle failed to deliver the Progress M-12M cargo payload to the
ISS on August 24.
• A Soyuz 2 launch vehicle failed to launch the Meridian 5 communications
satellite on December 23.
• 9 •
2011 Year in Review
U.S. AND FAA-LICENSED ORBITAL LAUNCH ACTIVITY
FAA-Licensed Orbital Launch Summary
ere was one FAA-licensed launch in 2011: one of the total of two commercial
launches conducted by multinational launch provider Sea Launch was a Zenit 3SL
launch vehicle carrying the Atlantic Bird 7 communications satellite to GEO (see
Table 6).
In 2011, FAA planned to license four commercial launches under NASAs COTS
and CRS programs, but all four of those launches slipped to 2012.
Over the past ve years, FAA has typically licensed four or ve launches per year.
However, in 2008, FAA licensed 11 launches, including 5 Sea Launch Zenit
3SL launches of commercial GEO communications satellites. Figures 9 and 10
summarize the number of FAA-licensed orbital launches and revenue from 2007-
2011.
U.S. and FAA-Licensed Orbital Launch Activity in Detail
U.S. launch vehicles provided 18 U.S. government launches in 2011. Nine of the
launches were for NASA: three Space Shuttle missions and six science missions.
e launch of one of the science missions, Glory, resulted in a failure. e U.S.
Department of Defense (DoD) also had nine launches: four carried classied
National Reconnaissance Oce (NRO) payloads and ve carried DoD or DoD-
sponsored payloads.
See Table 7 for a detailed breakdown of U.S. and FAA-licensed launch activity
during 2011 by vehicle.
Table 6. 2011 FAA-Licensed Orbital Launch Events
Date Vehicle
Primary
Payload
Orbit
Launch
Outcome
24-Sep-11 Zenit 3SL Atlantic Bird 7 GEO Success
Figure 9. FAA-Licensed Orbital Launch Events, 2007-2011
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
4
11
5
4
1
Number of Orbital Launchesss
Figure 10. Estimated Revenue for FAA-Licensed
Orbital Launch Events, 2007-2011
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
$220
$690
$398
$307
$100
$US Millions
• 10 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
e following is a list of U.S.-based launch service providers, highlighting their
launch activity in 2011. It includes all companies that launch from the United
States or under the regulatory oversight of the FAA/AST.
Orbital Sciences Corporation
Orbital provides the Minotaur, Pegasus, and Taurus vehicles for orbital launch.
Orbital performed four launches in 2011, using the Minotaur I, Minotaur IV,
and Taurus XL vehicles. In February, a Minotaur I launched NRO L-66 from
Vandenberg Air Force Base (VAFB). In March, a Taurus XL attempted to launch
NASAs Earth science satellite, Glory, into orbit from VAFB; this launch attempt
resulted in a failure. In June, another Minotaur I successfully launched ORS 1. In
September, a Minotaur IV launched a technology development satellite, TacSat 4.
Table 7. U.S. and FAA-Licensed Launch Vehicle Performance in 2011
UNITED STATES
SEA
LAUNCH
Vehicle Minotaur Minotaur IV Taurus XL Delta II
Delta IV
Medium+ (4,2)
Delta IV
Heavy
Atlas V
401
Atlas V
501
Atlas V
541
Atlas V
551
Shuttle Zenit 3SL
2011 Total
Launches
2 1 1 3 2 1 2 1 1 1 3 1
2011 Licensed
Launches
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Launch
Reliability
(2011)
2/2
100%
1/1
100%
0/1
0%
3/3
100%
2/2
100%
1/1
100%
2/2
100%
1/1
100%
1/1
100%
1/1
100%
3/3
100%
1/1
100%
Launch
Reliability
(Last 10 Years)
8/8
100%
3/3
100%
1/3
33%
20/20
100%
7/7
100%
5/5
100%
12/12
100%
3/3
100%
1/1
100%
2/2
100%
34/34
100%
23/24
(96%)
Year of First
Launch
2000 2010 2004 1995 2002 2004 2002 2010 2011 2006 1981 1999
Active Launch
Sites
VAFB,
Wallops
VAFB,
Kodiak
CCAFS,
VAFB
CCAFS,
VAFB
CCAFS,
VAFB
CCAFS,
VAFB
CCAFS,
VAFB
CCAFS,
VAFB
CCAFS CCAFS KSC
Sea Launch
Platform
LEO kg (lbs)
640
(1,411)
1,735
(3,822)
1,588
(3,500)
6,100
(13,440)
10,430
(22,974)
22,560
(49,740)
9,797
(21,598)
8,123
(17,908)
-- --
23,435
(51,557)
15,876
(35,000)
GTO kg (lbs) -- --
517
(1,140)
1,270
(2,800)
5,845
(12,874)
12,980
(28,620)
4,750
(10,470)
3,775
(8,320)
7,980
(17,593)
8,670
(19,114)
5,663
(12,459)
6,100
(13,448)
• 11 •
2011 Year in Review
United Launch Alliance
United Launch Alliance (ULA) conducts launches for the U.S. government launch
market. ULA manufactures and operates Boeing-heritage Delta and Lockheed
Martin-heritage Atlas launch vehicles. ULA is a 50-50 joint partnership between
Boeing and Lockheed Martin.
In 2011, ULA conducted 11 non-commercial launches:
• ree Delta II launches placed these payloads into orbit: SAC-D/Aquarius,
GRAIL A and B, and NPP.
• ree Delta IV launches placed these payloads into orbit: NRO L-49, NRO
L-27, and Navstar GPS 2F-02.
• Five Atlas V launches placed these payloads into orbit: X-37B OTV 2, NRO
L-34, SBIRS GEO 1, Juno, and MSL.
United Space Alliance
United Space Alliance (USA) is the launch services company for non-commercial
NASA Space Shuttle missions. Like ULA, USA is jointly owned by Boeing and
Lockheed Martin.
USA conducted three successful Space Shuttle launches from the Kennedy Space
Center in 2011. Space Shuttles Atlantis, Endeavour, and Discovery assisted in
completing the construction of the ISS. ese launches concluded the Space
Shuttle program, and the Space Shuttle eet is now retired.
e ve Space Shuttle vehicles—Atlantis, Challenger, Columbia, Discovery, and
Endeavour—have completed a total of 135 missions.
• irty-seven of these missions ew to the ISS and nine to the Russian Mir
space station.
• e Shuttle orbiters hosted more than 2,000 scientic experiments and
deployed a total of 180 payloads, including satellites and missions to Venus,
Jupiter, and the Sun.
• e Shuttles deployed 20 commercial satellites and returned 52 payloads from
space.
• Seven spacecra were retrieved, repaired, and redeployed, including the
Hubble Space Telescope.
• Two missions involved accidents, leading to the loss of the Challenger and
Columbia orbiters and their crews.
Sea Launch
e only FAA-licensed commercial orbital launch in 2011 was conducted by
multinational launch provider Sea Launch. Its Zenit 3SL launch vehicle inserted
the Atlantic Bird 7 communications satellite into GEO. e vehicle launched
from Sea Launchs Odyssey platform in the Pacic Ocean. It was the rst launch
• 12 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
conducted by Sea Launch aer company reorganization and emerging from
Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection procedure as a Swiss-based Russian majority-
owned company. e total price of the launch is estimated at $100 million.
2011 also saw one successful launch of the Land Launch system from Baikonur,
Kazakhstan, operated by Sea Launch. It deployed the Intelsat 18 commercial GEO
communications satellite.
FAA Reentry License Summary
In 2011, there were no reentries conducted under an FAA reentry license. e
NASA COTS and CRS missions in 2012 expect to use FAA reentry licenses.
INTERNATIONAL ORBITAL LAUNCH ACTIVITIES
e following section highlights non-U.S. launch activity on a country-by-country
basis.
Russia
In 2011, there were 31 Russian launches. Twenty-seven of these launches were
successful, and four failed. Ten launches were commercial, and 21 were non-
commercial launches. Of the non-commercial launches, nine were missions to the
ISS, nine were for military purposes, and three were civil government missions.
Table 8 and the lists below present a detailed breakdown of 2011 Russian launch
activity by vehicle.
RUSSIA
Vehicle Dnepr M Rockot Zenit 2M Zenit 3F Soyuz Soyuz 2 Soyuz U Proton M
2011 Total Launches 1 1 1 2 9 7 1 9
Launch Reliability
(2011)
1/1
100%
0/1
0%
1/1
100%
2/2
100%
8/9
89%
6/7
86%
1/1
100%
8/9
89%
Launch Reliability
(Last 10 Years)
4/4
100%
12/14
86%
2/2
100%
2/2
100%
95/97
98%
15/16
94%
3/3
100%
51/56
91%
Year of First Launch 2010 1994 2007 2011 1963 2004 2009 2000
Active Launch Sites Baikonur
Baikonur,
Plesetsk
Baikonur Baikonur
Baikonur,
Plesetsk
Baikonur,
Plesetsk
Plesetsk Baikonur
LEO kg (lbs)
4,100
(9,030)
1,850
(4,075)
12,030
(26,500)
--
6,708
(14,758)
7,800
(17,100)
6,700
(14,740)
21,000
(46,305)
GTO kg (lbs) -- -- --
2,500
(5,500)
1,350
(2,975)
1,700
(3,800)
--
5,500
(12,125)
Table 8. Russian Launch Vehicle Activity in 2011
• 13 •
2011 Year in Review
e 10 commercial missions included:
• ILS launched seven Proton M vehicles, carrying a total of nine satellites. e
Proton M carrying the Express AM-4 failed.
• ISC Kosmostras launched one Dnepr rocket, carrying a total of eight satellites.
• Two Soyuz 2 launches deployed 12 Globalstar 2 satellites.
e following nine launches were dedicated ISS missions:
• Five Soyuz rockets carrying Progress spacecra. e Soyuz mission in August
failed.
• Four Soyuz vehicles carrying manned Soyuz spacecra ferried individuals to
and from the ISS.
Russia executed nine additional launches for military purposes:
• A Rockot vehicle failed to launch GEO IK-2 No. II.
• Five Soyuz 2 rockets launched Glonass K1-1, Meridian 4, Glonass M42,
Glonass M46, and Meridian 5. e launch of Merdian 5 was unsuccessful.
• A Soyuz U launched Cosmos 2472.
• Two Proton M vehicles launched Cosmos 2473 and Glonass M43 through
M45.
Russia executed three launches for civil purposes:
• Two Zenit 3F launches carried Electro-L 1 and Spetkr R satellites.
• A Zenit 2M launched the co-manifested Phobos-Grunt (a mission to return
ground samples from Mars’ moon Phobos) and Yinghuo 1 satellites. e
launch vehicle performed successfully, although the payloads subsequently
failed to leave their initial Earth orbit.
Europe
Europe conducted seven launches in 2011:
• Four Ariane 5 launch vehicles launched eight GEO commercial satellites.
All four commercial Ariane 5 launches were dual manifests of GEO
communications satellites.
• An Ariane 5 ES-ATV launched ATV 2 to the ISS.
• A Soyuz 2, carrying two Galileo satellites, launched from the European launch
complex in Kourou, French Guiana. is was the rst Soyuz 2 launch from that
complex.
• e second Soyuz 2 launch from Kourou carried the Pleiades HR 1 remote
sensing mission, four ELISA satellites for the French Ministry of Defense, and
SSOT for the Government of Chile.
• 14 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
China
China conducted 19 orbital launches in 2011 (4 more than in 2010), of which 2
were commercial. All but one of the launches were successful. Nine of the launches
were to GEO. Eleven launched from the Xichang launch site, seven from Jiuquan,
and one from the Taiyuan launch site.
• A Long March 2C rocket failed to place an experimental satellite, Shijian 11-
04, into orbit.
• Two Long March vehicles carried commercial payloads: Eutelsat 1R and
NigComSat 1R.
• Long March vehicles launched four communications missions, including one
satellite for Pakistan and one in a dual manifest with a scientic payload.
• ree navigation satellites were launched.
• Four remote sensing payloads were deployed.
• Long March rockets placed ve development and scientic payloads into orbit,
including one in a dual manifest with a communications satellite.
Japan
Japan had one successful H IIB launch and two successful launches of the H IIA
rocket in 2011.
• H IIB launched an HTV 2 transport mission to the ISS.
• Two H IIA vehicles launched two IGS intelligence satellites.
India
e Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) performed three PSLV launches
in 2011. All launches were non-commercial.
• e GSAT-12 communications satellite was inserted into GEO in July.
• Two PSLV launches deployed seven scientic, remote sensing, and
communications satellites in LEO and SSO in April and October.
Iran
Irans Sar 2 rocket launched Rasad, a remote sensing satellite, on June 15.
Multinational
Multinational launch provider Sea Launch AG had two commercial launches
in 2011. In September, Zenit 3SL deployed Atlantic Bird 7. is launch was
performed under an FAA commercial launch license (see Page 9). In October,
Zenit 3SLB, a launch vehicle operated by Sea Launch, successfully launched Intelsat
18 from Baikonur, Kazakhstan.
• 15 •
2011 Year in Review
Table 9 summarizes 2011 launch activities for Europe, China, Japan, India, and
Iran, and the multinational category represented by Sea Launch AG.
FAA SUBORBITAL FLIGHT SUMMARY
Two suborbital ights were conducted under the authority of FAA experimental
permits in 2011: Blue Origin launched the PM-2 vehicle twice, on May 6 and
on August 24. While there were no FAA-permitted suborbital launches in 2010
and 2009, ve launches occurred in 2008 and nine in 2007. Unlike FAA-licensed
ights, permitted ights are limited to reusable suborbital launch vehicles and
intended for technology development, testing for crew, or testing before obtaining
a license. Vehicles cannot carry property or people for compensation or hire. e
rst permit ights were in 2006, aer the U.S. Congress granted authority in 2004.
Table 9. European, Chinese, Japanese, Indian, Iranian, and Multinational Launch Vehicle Activity in 2011
EUROPE CHINA JAPAN INDIA IRAN
LAND
LAUNCH
Vehicle
Ariane 5
ECA
Ariane 5
ES-ATV
Soyuz 2
Long
March
2C
Long
March
2D
Long
March
2F
Long
March
3A
Long
March
3B
Long
March
3C
Long
March
4B
H IIA H IIB PSLV Sar 2 Zenit 3SLB
Country/
Region
Europe Europe Europe China China China China China China China Japan Japan India Iran Ukraine
2011 Total
Launches
4 1 2 3 2 2 3 5 1 3 2 1 3 1 1
Launch
Reliability
(2011)
4/4
100%
1/1
100%
2/2
100%
2/3
67%
2/2
100%
2/2
100%
3/3
100%
5/5
100%
1/1
100%
3/3
100%
2/2
100%
1/1
100%
3/3
100%
1/1
100%
1/1
100%
Launch
Reliability
(Last 10 Years)
32/33
97%
2/2
100%
2/2
100%
14/15
93%
12/12
100%
8/8
100%
16/16
100%
13/13
100%
7/7
100%
14/14
100%
19/20
95%
2/2
100%
15/15
100%
2/2
100%
5/5
100%
Year of First
Launch
2002 2008 2011 1975 1992 1999 1994 1996 2008 1999 2001 2009 1993 2009 2008
Active Launch
Sites
Kourou Kourou Kourou
Jiuquan,
Taiyuan,
Xichang
Jiuquan Jiuquan
Taiyuan,
Xichang
Xichang Xichang Taiyuan Tanegashima Tanegashima
Satish
Dhawan
Semnan
Providence
Baikonur
LEO kg (lbs)
17,250
(37,950)
21,000
(46,297)
7,800
(17,100)
3,200
(7,048)
3,500
(7,700)
8,400
(18,500)
7,200
(15,859)
13,562
(29,900)
3,700
(8,200)
2,500
(5,512)
11,730
(25,860)
19,000
(42,000)
3,700
(8,150)
27
(60)
--
GTO kg (lbs)
10,500
(23,127)
8,000
(17,637)
1,700
(3,800)
1,000
(2,203)
1,250
(2,750)
--
2,500
(5,506)
4,491
(9,900)
--
1,500
(3,300)
5,800
(12,800)
8,000
(17,600)
800
(1,760)
--
3,600
(7,937)
• 16 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
Figure 11. Five-Year Summary (2007-2011) of Commercial
and Non-Commercial Launch Events
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
23
28
24
23
18
45
41
54
51
66
Number of Orbital Launchess
Non-Commercial Launches
Commercial Launches
2011 SPACE TRANSPORTATION TRENDS
FIVE-YEAR WORLDWIDE SPACE TRANSPORTATION
TRENDS
A total of 373 orbital launches have
been conducted in the past ve years.
Between 2007 and 2011, there has been
an average of 75 orbital launches per year
worldwide (see Figure 11). Commercial
launches suered between one and two
failures per year in 2007 through 2011,
as shown in Figure 12. During the past
ve years, there has been at least one
launch failure each year. (e denition
of a launch failure is in Appendix II.)
Six launches failed in 2011, the largest
number in the last ve years. e largest
number of launch failures (8) in the past
15 years occurred in 1999. e 2011 launch failures included four Russian launches
(including one commercial), one Chinese Long March vehicle launch, and one U.S.
Taurus XL launch vehicle. Figure 12 presents a ve-year trend of orbital launch
successes and failures.
Russia and the United States have conducted the most orbital launches, followed
by China and Europe (see Figure 13). ere were 116 commercial orbital launches
from 2007 to 2011. e number of launches rose from 23 in 2007 to a high of 28
in 2008 and dropped to 18 in 2011 (see Figures 14 and 15). e following is a
breakdown of commerical orbital
launches by country from 2007 to
2011:
• Russia had the most
commercial launches with 56.
• Europe followed with 26
commercial launches.
• e United States had 17
commercial launches.
• Multinational Sea Launch
performed 13 commercial
launches.
• China had three, and India
had one commercial launch.
Figure 12. Five-Year Summary (2007-2011) of
Orbital Launch Events and Launch Failures
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
21
26
24
23
17
2
2
1
44
40
51
47
61
1
1
3
4
5
Number of Launches
Total # of Non-Commercial Successes
Total # of Commercial Successes
Total # of Non-Commercial Failures
Total # of Commercial Failures
• 17 •
2011 Year in Review
e demand for commercial NGSO launches, which peaked in the late 1990s, was
low in the four years before 2007. e number of commercial NGSO launches
sharply increased in 2007 and 2008, and then increased again in 2010 aer a slow
year in 2009. ese high levels are mostly driven by the launch of replacement
satellites for the existing constellations, such as ORBCOMM and Globalstar, and
by the launch of new constellations, such as SAR-Lupe and COSMO-SkyMed. In
2011, 2 of the 3 commercial NGSO launches deployed 12 more second-generation
Globalstar satellites. See Figure 15 for commercial launches by orbit type for the
last ve years.
Figure 16 shows the number of payloads providing commercial services launched
on commercial and non-commercial vehicles over the past ve years. e number of
commercial NGSO satellites launched per year uctuates signicantly year to year.
is is because several commercial NGSO satellites are oen launched together
(multi-manifested) on the same launch vehicle. e launches of Globalstar (6 in
2010 and 12 in 2011), ORBCOMM (6 in 2008) and RapidEye constellation
satellites (5 in 2008) explain why there are signicantly more payloads launched in
2008, 2010, and 2011.
Total: 373 Commercial and
Non-Commercial Launches
United States
91 (24%)
South Korea
2 (1%)
North Korea
1 (0%)
Israel
2 (1%)
India
14 (4%)
Japan
11 (3%)
Multinational
13 (3%)
China
61 (16%)
Europe
32 (9%)
Russia
143 (38%)
Iran
3 (1%)
Total: 373 Commercial and Non-Commercial Launches
Figure 13. Five-Year Worldwide Total Orbital
Launch Market Share (2007-2011)
Figure 16. Five-Year Global Commercial Payloads by Orbit (2007-2011)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
13
19
4
12
14
18
23
22
21
21
Number of Commercial Payloads
GEO
NGSO
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
12
10
5
8
3
13
18
19
15
15
Number of Orbital Launches
Figure 15. Five-Year Global Commercial Launch
Events by Orbit (2007-2011)
GEO
NGSO
Figure 14. Five-Year Worldwide Commercial Orbital
Launch Market Share (2007-2011)
United States
17 (15%)
India
1 (1%)
Multinational
13 (11%)
China
3 (3%)
Europe
26 (22%)
Russia
56 (48%)
Total: 116 Commercial Launches
Total: 117 Commercial Launches
• 18 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
Commercial launch revenues steadily increased from 2006 to 2010. Revenues
almost doubled between 2006 and 2010, from $1.4 billion to about $2.5 billion,
and dropped to about $1.9 billion in 2011 due to schedule changes that pushed
several commercial launches to 2012 (see Figure 17 and Table 10).
COMMERCIAL SATELLITE AND LAUNCH TRENDS
e commercial space transportation market is driven largely by the demand for
launches of GEO telecommunications satellites and to a lesser (but growing) extent
by a variety of NGSO satellites. Historically, the majority of commercial launches
have been to GEO. Usually, GEO launches deploy larger payloads and require
larger launch vehicles, thus generating more revenue than those to NGSO. More
commercial launches to NGSO have taken place in recent years.
e supply of launch vehicle options continues to increase, despite only a marginal
increase in demand for launches. Competition remains strong between United
States, European, multinational, and Russian providers, while new entrants are
joining, re-joining, or advancing toward the commercial market. For example, the
Land Launch version of the Zenit, the Dnepr, the Soyuz (marketed and launched
by Arianespace), and the Falcon 9 are all competing for commercial launches. e
Japanese are marketing the H IIA commercially, and the Indians and Chinese,
although limited by the U.S. export policies, are also targeting commercial launch
customers.
Table 10. Estimated Commercial Launch Revenues, 2007-2011
(US$ Millions)
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
United States $150 $215 $298 $307 $0
Russia $477 $581 $742 $826 $707
Europe $840 $700 $1,020 $1,320 $880
China $50 $0 $70 $0 $140
India $11 $0 $0 $0 $0
Multinational $70 $475 $280 $0 $200
TOTAL $1,598 $1,971 $2,410 $2,453 $1,927
Figure 17. Approximate Launch Revenues for Commercial
Launch Events (2007-2011)
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
$1,800
$2,000
$2,200
$2,400
$2,600
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
US$ Millions
Russia
USA
Europe
Multinational
India
China
• 19 •
2011 Year in Review
INTERNATIONALLY COMPETED LAUNCHES
e denitions of “commercial payload” and “commercial launch” are complex and
open to interpretation (see Appendix II for denitions of these terms). Figure 18
shows trends for each country whose launch providers compete in the international
marketplace. e chart reects only launch service providers competing in the
international marketplace for open-bid launch service contracts. From 2007 to
2011, there were 109 internationally competed launch events.
Figure 18. Five-Year Worldwide Internationally Competed
Launch Events (2007-2011)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
3
4
1 1
12
11
10
13
10
6
5
5
6
4
1
6
4
2
1
1
1
2
Number of Launches
Russia
USA
Europe
Multinational
India
China
• 20 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
2012 LAUNCH ACTIVITY PROJECTION
(FIRST SIX MONTHS OF 2012)
Figure 19 shows the total number of
projected orbital launches by each
country and the relative percentage of
launches for each country for the rst six
months of 2012. Launches are grouped
by the country in which the primary
vehicle manufacturer is based.
Figure 20 shows the total number
of projected orbital launches of each
launch vehicle in the rst half of 2012.
Figure 21 shows all projected commercial orbital launch events for the rst half of
2012. Figure 22 shows estimated commercial launch revenue from the projected
commercial orbital launches in January through June 2012.
Figure 23 shows commercial against non-commercial projected orbital launch
events from January through June 2012. Figure 24 shows projected commercial
suborbital against commercial orbital launch events from January through June
2012.
Figure 19. Total Projected Launches by Country: January - June 2012
United States
10 (18%)
India
2 (4%)
Japan
2 (4%)
Multinational
1 (2%)
China
5 (9%)
Europe
10 (18%)
Russia
24 (44%)
Iran
1 (2%)
Total: 55 Commercial and Non-Commercial Launches
Figure 20. Total Projected Launch Vehicle Use: January - June 2012
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
2
8
10
Atlas V
Rockot
Proton
Pegasus XL
Falcon 9
Delta IV
Antares
PSLV
Long
March
Ariane 5
Zenit 3SLB
Soyuz
Soyuz 2
Strela
Dnepr
Sar 2
Vega
Soyuz 2
1
1
22
3
1
1
1
2
Iran
USA
Russia
Europe
China
India
6
1 1
1
1
Japan
H IIA
H IIB
Zenit 3SL
1 1
4
5
Multi-
national
• 21 •
2011 Year in Review
Figure 25 shows projected payload use (commercial and government) for payloads
to launch from January through June 2012. Figure 26 shows the same projected
payloads (commercial and government) by mass class. e total number of payloads
launched may not equal the total number of launches, due to multiple manifesting
(launching of multiple payloads by a single launch vehicle).
ere are no FAA-licensed commercial suborbital launch events or FAA
experimental permit ights projected for the rst half of 2012. However, there is a
likelihood of at least a limited number of such launch events or ights to take place
in the latter half of 2012.
Figure 26. Projected Payload Mass Class: January - June 2012
Intermediate
8 (10%)
Small
19 (23%)
Micro
12 (14%)
Large
17 (20%)
Heavy
5 (6%)
Medium
10 (12%)
Total: 84 Payloads
Unknown
13 (15%)
Figure 25. Projected Payload Use: January - June 2012
Total: 84 Payloads
Classied
4 (5%)
Scientic
9 (11%)
Test
9 (11%)
ISS
5 (6%)
Remote
Sensing
13 (15%)
Navigation
3 (4%)
Development
3 (4%)
Crewed
2 (2%)
Communications
31 (37%)
Meteorological
4 (5%)
Early Warning
1 (1%)
Figure 24. Projected Commercial Orbital vs. Commercial
Suborbital Launch Events: January - June 2012
Commercial Suborbital
0 (0%)
Commercial Orbital
18 (100%)
Figure 22. Estimated Commercial Launch Revenue:
January - June 2012 (US$ Millions)
United States
$56M (3%)
Multinational
$100M (5%)
China
$70M (4%)
Europe
$1,100M (58%)
Russia
$572M (30%)
Total: $1,898M
Figure 23. Projected Commercial vs. Non-Commercial
Launch Events By Country: January - June 2012
Non-Commercial
37 (67%)
Commercial
18 (33%)
Total: 55 Launches
Figure 21. Projected Commercial Launch Events by Country:
January - June 2012
United States
3 (17%)
Multinational
1 (6%)
China
1 (6%)
Europe
5 (28%)
Russia
8 (44%)
Total: 18 Commercial Launches
• 22 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
APPENDIX I: 2011 WORLDWIDE ORBITAL LAUNCH EVENTS
Date Vehicle Site Payload(s) Orbit Operator Manufacturer Use
Comm'l
Price L M
20-Jan-11 Delta IV Heavy VAFB NRO L-49 SSO NRO Lockheed Martin Classied S S
20-Jan-11 Zenit 3F Baikonur Electro-L 1 GEO Roshydromet NPO Lavotchkin Meteorological S S
22-Jan-11 H IIB Tanegashima Kounotori (HTV 2) LEO JAXA Mitsubishi Heavy Industries ISS Cargo S S
28-Jan-11 Soyuz Baikonur Progress M-09M LEO Roscosmos RSC Energia ISS Cargo S S
01-Feb-11 Rockot Plesetsk GEO IK-2 No. II LEO Russian Space Forces Reshetnev Company Navigation F F
06-Feb-11 Minotaur 1 VAFB RPP (NRO L-66) SSO NRO Classied Classied S S
16-Feb-11 Ariane 5 ES-ATV Kourou ATV 2 LEO ESA EADS Astrium ISS Cargo S S
24-Feb-11 Shuttle Discovery KSC STS 133 (ELC-4, PMM) LEO NASA Rockwell International Crewed S S
26-Feb-11 Soyuz 2 Plesetsk Glonass K1-1 MEO Russian Space Forces Reshetnev Company Navigation S S
04-Mar-11 Taurus XL VAFB Glory
Kysat 1
Hermes
Explorer 1 (Prime)
SSO
SSO
SSO
ELI
NASA
Kentucky Space
Colorado Space Grant Con.
Montana Space Grant Con.
Orbital Sciences Corp.
Kentucky Space
Colorado Space Grant Con.
Montana Space Grant Con.
Scientic
Test
Communications
Scientic
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
05-Mar-11
Atlas V 501 CCAFS X-37B OTV 2 LEO USAF Boeing Classied S S
11-Mar-11 Delta IV
Medium+ (4, 2)
CCAFS NRO L-27 GEO NRO Classied Communications S S
04-Apr-11 Soyuz Baikonur Soyuz TMA-21 LEO Roscosmos RSC Energia Crewed S S
10-Apr-11 Long March 3A Xichang Beidou 2-IGS 3 GEO People's Liberation Army CAST Navigation S S
14-Apr-11 Atlas V 401 VAFB NRO L-34 LEO NRO Classied Classied S S
20-Apr-11 PSLV Satish Dhawan Resourcesat 2
Youthsat
X-Sat
SSO
SSO
SSO
ISRO
Bauman Moscow State
Technical University
Centre for Research in
Satellite Technologies
ISRO
ISRO
Centre for Research in
Satellite Technologies
Remote Sensing
Scientic
Remote Sensing
S
S
S
S
S
S
22-Apr-11 V Ariane 5 ECA Kourou *
*
Yahsat 1A
Intelsat New Dawn
GEO
GEO
Yah Satellite
Communications Company
Intelsat
EADS Astrium
Orbital Sciences Corp.
Communications
Communications
$220M S
S
S
S
27-Apr-11 Soyuz Baikonur Progress M-10M LEO Roscosmos RSC Energia ISS Cargo S S
04-May-11 Soyuz 2 Baikonur Meridian 4 ELI Russian Space Forces Reshetnev Company Communications S S
07-May-11 Atlas V 401 CCAFS SBIRS GEO 1 GEO USAF Lockheed Martin Early Warning S S
16-May-11 Shuttle Endeavour KSC STS 134 (AMS, ELC-3) LEO
NASA Rockwell International Crewed S S
20-May-11 V Proton M Baikonur * Telstar 14R GEO Telesat Space Systems/Loral Communications $85M S S
20-May-11 V Ariane 5 ECA Kourou *
*
Insat 4G/GSAT-8
ST 2
GEO
GEO
ISRO
Telecom/Chunghwa
Telecom
ISRO
Mitsubishi Electronic Corp.
Communications
Communications
$220M S
S
S
S
07-Jun-11 Soyuz Baikonur Soyuz TMA-02M LEO Roscosmos RSC Energia ISS Cargo S S
10-Jun-11 Delta II 7320 VAFB SAC-D/Aquarius SSO NASA/CONAE INVAP Remote Sensing S S
15-Jun-11 Sar 2 Semnan Province Rasad LEO Iranian Aerospace
Organization
Iranian Space Agency Remote Sensing S S
20-Jun-11 Long March 3B Xichang * Chinasat 10 GEO China Direct Broadcasting
Satellite Co., Ltd.
CAST Communications S S
21-Jun-11 Soyuz Baikonur Progress M-11M LEO Roscosmos RSC Energia ISS Cargo S S
V
Denotes commercial launch, dened as a launch that is internationally competed or FAA-licensed, or privately nanced launch activity. For multiple manifested launches, certain secondary
payloads whose launches were commercially procured may also constitute a commercial launch.
+ Denotes FAA-licensed launch.
* Denotes a commercial payload, dened as a spacecraft that serves a commercial function or is operated by a commercial entity.
L and M refer to the outcome of the Launch and Mission: S=Success, P=Partial Success, F=Failure.
Notes: All prices are estimates.
All launch dates are based on local time at the launch site.
See Appendix III for denitions of payload orbits.
• 23 •
2011 Year in Review
• 22 •
APPENDIX I (CONTINUED)
Date Vehicle Site Payload(s) Orbit Operator Manufacturer Use
Comm'l
Price L M
27-Jun-11 Soyuz U Plesetsk Cosmos 2472 LEO Russian Space Forces RSC Energia Classied S S
29-Jun-11 Minotaur 1 Wallops FF ORS 1 LEO USAF Goodrich ISR Systems Classied S S
06-Jul-11 Long March 2C Jiuquan Shijian 11-03 SSO CAST Dongfanghong Satellite Co. Scientic S S
08-Jul-11 Shuttle Atlantis KSC STS 135 (MPLM, LMC) LEO NASA Rockwell International Crewed S S
11-Jul-11 Long March 3C Xichang Tianlian 1B GEO CAST CAST Communications S S
13-Jul-11 V Soyuz 2 Baikonur *
*
*
*
*
*
Globalstar 2nd Gen 07
Globalstar 2nd Gen 08
Globalstar 2nd Gen 09
Globalstar 2nd Gen 10
Globalstar 2nd Gen 11
Globalstar 2nd Gen 12
LEO
LEO
LEO
LEO
LEO
LEO
Globalstar, Inc.
Globalstar, Inc.
Globalstar, Inc.
Globalstar, Inc.
Globalstar, Inc.
Globalstar, Inc.
Thales Alenia Space
Thales Alenia Space
Thales Alenia Space
Thales Alenia Space
Thales Alenia Space
Thales Alenia Space
Communications
Communications
Communications
Communications
Communications
Communications
$50M S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
15-Jul-11 V Proton M Baikonur * SES-3
KazSat 2
GEO
GEO
SES World Skies
JSC Kazsat
Orbital Sciences Corp.
Khrunichev State Research
& Production Space Center
Communications
Communications
$85M S
S
S
S
15-Jul-11 PSLV Satish Dhawan GSAT 12 GEO ISRO ISRO Communications S S
16-Jul-11 Delta IV
Medium+ (4, 2)
CCAFS Navstar GPS 2F-02 MEO USAF Boeing Navigation S S
18-Jul-11 Zenit 3F Baikonur Spektr R ELI Russian Academy of
Sciences
NPO Lavotchkin Scientic S S
26-Jul-11 Long March 3A Xichang Beidou 2-IGS 4 GEO People's Liberation Army CAST Navigation S S
29-Jul-11 Long March 2C Jiuquan Shijian 11-02 SSO CAST Dongfanghong Satellite Co. Scientic S S
05-Aug-11 Atlas V 551 CCAFS Juno EXT NASA/JPL Lockheed Martin Scientic S S
06-Aug-11 V Ariane 5 ECA Kourou *
*
Astra 1N
BSAT-3c/JCSAT-110R
GEO
GEO
SES Astra
Sky Perfect JCSAT Corp.
EADS Astrium
Lockheed Martin
Communications
Communications
$220M S
S
S
S
11-Aug-11 Long March 3B Xichang * Paksat 1R GEO SUPARCO China Great Wall Industry
Corp.
Communications S S
15-Aug-11 Long March 4B Taiyuan Hai Yang 2A SSO China State Oceanic
Administration
Shanghai Institute of
Satellite Engineering
Remote Sensing S S
17-Aug-11 V Dnepr M Dombarovskiy
*
*
Sich 2
NX
Nigeriasat 2
Edusat
RASAT
BPA 2
Aprizesat 5
Aprizesat 6
SSO
SSO
SSO
SSO
SSO
SSO
LEO
LEO
National Space Agency of
Ukraine
NASRDA
NASRDA
Italian Space Agency
TUBITAK-UZAY
Yuzhnoye
SpaceQuest, Ltd.
SpaceQuest, Ltd.
NPO Lavotchkin
Surrey Satellite Tech. Ltd.
Surrey Satellite Tech. Ltd.
University of Rome
TUBITAK-UZAY
Hartron-Arkos
SpaceQuest, Ltd.
SpaceQuest., Ltd.
Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing
Scientic
Scientic
Development
Communications
Communications
$12M S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
17-Aug-11 V Proton M Baikonur * Express AM4 GEO Russian Satellite
Communications Co.
Reshetnev Company Communications $85M F F
18-Aug-11 Long March 2C Jiuquan Shijian 11-04 SSO CAST Dongfanghong Satellite Co. Scientic F F
24-Aug-11 Soyuz Baikonur Progress M-12M LEO Roscosmos RSC Energia ISS Cargo F F
10-Sep-11 Delta II 7920H CCAFS GRAIL A
GRAIL B
EXT
EXT
NASA/JPL
NASA/JPL
Lockheed Martin
Lockheed Martin
Scientic
Scientic
S
S
S
S
18-Sep-11 Long March 3B Xichang Chinasat 1A GEO People's Liberation Army CAST Communications S S
V
Denotes commercial launch, dened as a launch that is internationally competed or FAA-licensed, or privately nanced launch activity. For multiple manifested launches, certain secondary
payloads whose launches were commercially procured may also constitute a commercial launch.
+ Denotes FAA-licensed launch.
* Denotes a commercial payload, dened as a spacecraft that serves a commercial function or is operated by a commercial entity.
L and M refer to the outcome of the Launch and Mission: S=Success, P=Partial Success, F=Failure.
Notes: All prices are estimates.
All launch dates are based on local time at the launch site.
See Appendix III for denitions of payload orbits.
• 24 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
APPENDIX I (CONTINUED)
Date Vehicle Site Payload(s) Orbit Operator Manufacturer Use
Comm'l
Price L M
20-Sep-11 Proton M Baikonur Cosmos 2473 GEO Tass-Louch Telecom Reshetnev Company Communications S S
21-Sep-11 V Ariane 5 ECA Kourou *
*
Arabsat 5C
SES 2
GEO
GEO
Arabsat
SES World Skies
EADS Astrium
Orbital Sciences Corp.
Communications
Communications
$220M S
S
S
S
23-Sep-11 H IIA Tanegashima IGS-4C (Optical) SSO Japan Defense Agency Mitsubishi Electronic Corp. Classied S S
24-Sep-11 V + Zenit 3SL Sea Launch
Platform
* Atlantic Bird 7 GEO Eutelsat EADS Astrium Communications $100M S S
27-Sep-11 Minotaur IV Kodiak LC TacSat-4 HEO USAF NRL/APL Development S S
29-Sep-11 Long March 2F Jiuquan Tiangong 1 LEO China Aerospace Corp. CAST Development S S
29-Sep-11 V Proton M Baikonur * QuetzSat-1 GEO QuetzSat Space Systems/Loral Communications $85M S S
02-Oct-11 Soyuz 2 Plesetsk Glonass M42 MEO Russian Space Forces Reshetnev Company Navigation S S
06-Oct-11 V Zenit 3SLB Baikonur * Intelsat 18 GEO Intelsat Orbital Sciences Corp. Communications $100M S S
07-Oct-11 V Long March 3B Xichang * Eutelsat W3C GEO Eutelsat Thales Alenia Space Communications
$70M S S
12-Oct-11 PSLV Satish Dhawan Megha Tropiques
Jugnu
SRMSAT
Vesselsat 1
LEO
LEO
SSO
LEO
CNES
IIT Kapur
SRM University
LuxSpace Sarl
ISRO
IIT Kapur
SRM University
LuxSpace Sarl
Scientic
Remote Sensing
Scientic
Communications
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
19-Oct-11 V Proton M Baikonur * ViaSat 1 GEO ViaSat Space Systems/Loral Communications $85M S S
21-Oct-11 Soyuz 2 Kourou Galileo 1
Galileo 2
MEO
MEO
European Space Agency
European Space Agency
OHB System
OHB Systems
Navigation
Navigation
S
S
S
S
28-Oct-11 Delta II 7920 VAFB NPP
RAX 2
M-Cubed
AS-1
Explorer-1 (PRIME)
Unit 2
DICE 1
DICE 2
SSO
LEO
LEO
LEO
LEO
LEO
LEO
NASA/NOAA
University of Michigan
University of Michigan
Auburn University
Montana State University
Utah State University
Utah State University
Ball Aerospace
University of Michigan
University of Michigan
Auburn University
Montana State University
Utah State University
Utah State University
Meteorological
Scientic
Remote Sensing
Scientic
Scientic
Scientic
Scientic
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
30-Oct-11 Soyuz Baikonur Progress M-13M LEO Roscosmos RSC Energia ISS Cargo S S
31-Oct-11 Long March 2F Jiuquan Shenzhou 8 LEO China Aerospace Corp. CAST
Development S S
04-Nov-11 Proton M Baikonur Glonass M43
Glonass M44
Glonass M45
MEO
MEO
MEO
Russian Space Forces
Russian Space Forces
Russian Space Forces
Reshetnev Company
Reshetnev Company
Reshetnev Company
Navigation
Navigation
Navigation
S
S
S
S
S
S
08-Nov-11 Zenit 2M Baikonur Phobos-Grunt
Yinghuo
EXT
EXT
Roscosmos
China National Space
Academy
NPO Lavotchkin
Shanghai Institute of
Satellite Engineering
Scientic
Scientic
S
S
F
F
09-Nov-11 Long March 4B Xichang Yaogan 12
Tianxun 1
SSO
SSO
People's Liberation Army
Nanjing University of
Aeronautics & Astronautics
Shanghai Academy of Space
Technology
Nanjing University of
Aeronautics & Astronautics
Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing
S
S
S
S
14-Nov-11 Soyuz Baikonur Soyuz TMA-22 LEO Roscosmos RSC Energia Crewed S S
20-Nov-11 Long March 2D Jiuquan Chuang Xing 1-03
Shiyan Wexing 4
SSO
SSO
Shanghai Academy of
Space Technology
Dongfanghong Satellite Co.
China Academy of Science
Harbin Institute of
Technology
Communications
Scientic
S
S
S
S
25-Nov-11 V Proton M Baikonur * Asiasat 7 GEO Asiasat Space Systems/Loral Communications $85M S S
V
Denotes commercial launch, dened as a launch that is internationally competed or FAA-licensed, or privately nanced launch activity. For multiple manifested launches, certain secondary
payloads whose launches were commercially procured may also constitute a commercial launch.
+ Denotes FAA-licensed launch.
* Denotes a commercial payload, dened as a spacecraft that serves a commercial function or is operated by a commercial entity.
L and M refer to the outcome of the Launch and Mission: S=Success, P=Partial Success, F=Failure.
Notes: All prices are estimates.
All launch dates are based on local time at the launch site.
See Appendix III for denitions of payload orbits.
• 25 •
2011 Year in Review
• 24 •
APPENDIX I (CONTINUED)
Date Vehicle Site Payload(s) Orbit Operator Manufacturer Use
Comm'l
Price L M
26-Nov-11 Atlas V 541 CCAFS Mars Science
Laboratory
EXT NASA NASA/JPL Scientic S S
28-Nov-11 Soyuz 2 Plesetsk Glonass M46 MEO Russian Space Forces Reshetnev Company Navigation S S
29-Nov-11 Long March 2D Jiuquan Yaogan 13 SSO People's Liberation Army Shanghai Academy of Space
Technology
Classied S S
01-Dec-11 Long March 3A Xichang Beidou 2-IGS 5 GEO People's Liberation Army CAST Navigation S S
11-Dec-11 V Proton M Baikonur
*
Luch 5A
Amos 5
GEO
GEO
Roscosmos
SpaceCom Ltd.
Reshetnev Company
Reshetnev Company
Communications
Communications
$85M S
S
S
S
12-Dec-11 H IIA Tanegashima IGS-4B (Radar) SSO Japan Defense Agency Mitsubishi Electronic Corp. Classied S S
16-Dec-11 Soyuz 2 Kourou Pleiades HR 1
ELISA 1
ELISA 2
ELISA 3
ELISA 4
SSOT
LEO
LEO
LEO
LEO
LEO
SSO
CNES
French MoD
French MoD
French MoD
French MoD
Government of Chile
EADS Astrium
EADS Astrium
EADS Astrium
EADS Astrium
EADS Astrium
EADS Astrium
Remote Sensing
Classied
Classied
Classied
Classied
Remote Sensing
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
19-Dec-11 V Long March 3B Xichang *
Nigcomsat 1R GEO Nigerian Communication
Satellite Ltd.
CAST Communications $70M S S
21-Dec-11 Soyuz Baikonur Soyuz TMA-03M LEO Roscosmos RSC Energia Crewed S S
22-Dec-11 Long March 4B Xichang Ziyuan 1-2C SSO China State Bureau of
Surveying and Mapping
CAST Remote Sensing S S
23-Dec-11 Soyuz 2 Plesetsk Meridian 5 ELI Russian Space Forces Reshetnev Company Communications F F
28-Dec-11 V Soyuz 2 Baikonur *
*
*
*
*
*
Globalstar 2nd Gen 13
Globalstar 2nd Gen 14
Globalstar 2nd Gen 15
Globalstar 2nd Gen 16
Globalstar 2nd Gen 17
Globalstar 2nd Gen 18
LEO
LEO
LEO
LEO
LEO
LEO
Globalstar, Inc.
Globalstar, Inc.
Globalstar, Inc.
Globalstar, Inc.
Globalstar, Inc.
Globalstar, Inc.
Thales Alenia Space
Thales Alenia Space
Thales Alenia Space
Thales Alenia Space
Thales Alenia Space
Thales Alenia Space
Communications
Communications
Communications
Communications
Communications
Communications
$50M S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
V
Denotes commercial launch, dened as a launch that is internationally competed or FAA-licensed, or privately nanced launch activity. For multiple manifested launches, certain secondary
payloads whose launches were commercially procured may also constitute a commercial launch.
+ Denotes FAA-licensed launch.
* Denotes a commercial payload, dened as a spacecraft that serves a commercial function or is operated by a commercial entity.
L and M refer to the outcome of the Launch and Mission: S=Success, P=Partial Success, F=Failure.
Notes: All prices are estimates.
All launch dates are based on local time at the launch site.
See Appendix III for denitions of payload orbits.
• 26 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
APPENDIX II: PROJECTED WORLDWIDE ORBITAL
LAUNCH EVENTS FOR FIRST SIX MONTHS OF 2012
Date Vehicle Site Payload(s) Orbit Operator Manufacturer Use
Comm'l
Price
10-Jan-12 Long March 4B Taiyuan Ziyuan 3 SSO China State Bureau of
Surveying & Mapping
CAST Remote Sensing
19-Jan-12 Delta IV
Medium +(5, 4)
CCAFS WGS 4 GEO USAF Boeing Communications
21-Jan-12 V Proton M Baikonur * SES 4 GEO SES World Skies Space Systems/Loral Communications $85M
24-Jan-12 V Proton M Baikonur * Sirius FM-6 GEO Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. Space Systems/Loral Communications $85M
25-Jan-12 Soyuz Baikonur Progress M-14M LEO Roscosmos RSC Energia ISS Cargo
Jan-12 Strela Baikonur Kondor E LEO NPO Machinostroyeniya NPO Machinostroyeniya Remote Sensing
Jan-12 Long March 3A Xichang Feng Yun 2F GEO China Meteorological
Administration
Shanghai Institute of Satellite
Engineering
Meteorological
02-Feb-12 V Soyuz 2 Baikonur *
*
*
*
*
*
Globalstar 2nd Gen 19
Globalstar 2nd Gen 20
Globalstar 2nd Gen 21
Globalstar 2nd Gen 22
Globalstar 2nd Gen 23
Globalstar 2nd Gen 24
LEO
LEO
LEO
LEO
LEO
LEO
Globalstar, Inc.
Globalstar, Inc.
Globalstar, Inc.
Globalstar, Inc.
Globalstar, Inc.
Globalstar, Inc.
Thales Alenia Space
Thales Alenia Space
Thales Alenia Space
Thales Alenia Space
Thales Alenia Space
Thales Alenia Space
Communications
Communications
Communications
Communications
Communications
Communications
$50M
07-Feb-12 Vega Kourou LARES
PW-Sat 1
XaTcobeo
Robusta
e-St@r
Goliat
ALMASAT
LEO
LEO
LEO
LEO
LEO
LEO
SSO
Italian Space Agency
Warsaw Polytech
University of Vigo
University of Montepellier II
Polytech University of Turin
University of Bucharest
University of Bologna
Italian Space Agency
Warsaw Polytech
University of Vigo
University of Montepellier II
Polytech University of Turin
University of Bucharest
University of Bologna
Test
Test
Test
Test
Scientic
Remote Sensing
Test
10-Feb-12 Proton M Baikonur Cosmos (Oko) TBD Russian Space Forces Reshetnev Company Early Warning
Feb-12 Rockot Baikonur Aeolus SSO European Space Agency EADS Astrium Scientic
Feb-12 Proton M Baikonur Luch 5B
Yamal 300K
GEO
GEO
Roscosmos
Gazprom Space Systems
Reshetnev Company
Reshetnev Company
Communications
Communications
06-Mar-12 V Proton M Baikonur * Intelsat 22 GEO Intelsat Boeing Communications $85M
09-Mar-12 Ariane 5 ES-ATV Kourou ATV 3 LEO European Space Agency EADS Astrium ISS Cargo
14-Mar-12 Pegasus XL Kwajalein Island NuSTAR LEO NASA/JPL Orbital Sciences Corp. Scientic
28-Mar-12 Delta IV M+ Vandenberg AFB DMSP 5D-3-F20 SSO NOAA Lockheed Martin Meteorological
29-Mar-12 Delta IV Medium-
Plus (5, 2)
Vandenberg AFB NRO L-25 SSO NRO Classied Classied
30-Mar-12 Soyuz Baikonur Soyuz TMA-04M LEO Roscosmos RSC Energia Crewed
Mar-12 Sar 2 Semnan
Providence
Navid (Zafar) SSO Government of Iran Government of Iran Remote Sensing
Mar-12 Long March 2F Jiuquan Shenzhou 9 LEO China Aerospace Corp. CAST Development
Mar-12 PSLV Satish Dhawan Brite Austria 1
Brite Austria 2
Sapphire
NEOSSAT
LEO
LEO
LEO
SSO
University of Vienna
University of Vienna
Canadian Ministry of Defense
Canadian Space Agency
University of Vienna
University of Vienna
MDA
Dynacon Inc.
Scientic
Scientic
Remote Sensing
Scientic
Mar-12 PSLV Satish Dhawan Risat 1
Venta 1
SSO
LEO
ISRO
Government of Latvia
ISRO
University of Bremen
Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing
V
Denotes commercial launch, dened as a launch that is internationally competed or FAA-licensed, or privately nanced launch activity. For multiple manifested launches, certain secondary
payloads whose launches were commercially procured may also constitute a commercial launch.
+ Denotes FAA-licensed launch.
* Denotes a commercial payload, dened as a spacecraft that serves a commercial function or is operated by a commercial entity.
L and M refer to the outcome of the Launch and Mission: S=Success, P=Partial Success, F=Failure.
Notes: All prices are estimates.
All launch dates are as of December 31, 2011, and are based on local time at the launch site.
See Appendix III for denitions of payload orbits.
• 27 •
2011 Year in Review
• 26 •
APPENDIX II (CONTINUED)
Date Vehicle Site Payload(s) Orbit Operator Manufacturer Use
Comm'l
Price
1Q-12 V + Falcon 9 CCAFS * Dragon COTS Demo 2/3 LEO SpaceX SpaceX Development $56M
1Q-12 V + Antares Wallops FF *
*
Antares Demo Flight
Cygnus Mass Simulator
LEO
LEO
Orbital Sciences Corp.
Orbital Sciences Corp.
Orbital Sciences Corp.
Orbital Sciences Corp.
Test TBA
1Q-12 V Long March 3B Xichang * APSTAR 7 GEO APT Satellite Co., Ltd. Thales Alenia Space Communications $70M
1Q-12 V Ariane 5 ECA Kourou * Jupiter GEO Hughes Network Systems Space Systems/Loral Communications $220M
1Q-12 V Ariane 5 ECA Kourou * GSAT 10 GEO ISRO ISRO Communications $220M
1Q-12 Proton M Baikonur *
*
Telkom 3
Express MD2
GEO
GEO
Telkom Indonesia
Russian Satellite
Communication Co.
Reshetnev Company
Khrunichev State Research &
Production Space Center
Communications
Communications
1Q-12 V Dnepr 1A Dombarovskiy * Kompsat 5 LEO KARI KARI Remote Sensing $12M
1Q-12 V Proton M Baikonur * Intelsat 23 GEO Intelsat Orbital Sciences Corp. Communications $85M
1Q-12 Rockot Plesetsk Cosmos (Military
Gonets 1)
Gonets M-03
Gonets M-04
MIR (Yubileyniy 2)
LEO
LEO
LEO
LEO
Russian Space Forces
SMOLSAT
SMOLSAT
Reshetnev Company
Reshetnev Company
Reshetnev Company
Reshetnev Company
Reshetnev Company
Communications
Communications
Communications
Communications
1Q-12 V + Zenit 3SL Sea Launch
Platform
* Intelsat 19 GEO Intelsat Space Systems/Loral Communications $100M
1Q-12 Soyuz Baikonur Kanopus B1
BelKa 2
Zond PP
ADS-1B
TET-1
SSO
SSO
SSO
SSO
SSO
VNIIEM
National Academy of Sciences
of Belarus
Roscosmos
COM DEV International
DLR
VNIIEM
RSC Energia
NPO Lavotchkin
Surrey Satellite Tech. Ltd.
Kayser-Threde GmbH
Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing
Scientic
Remote Sensing
Test
25-Apr-12 Soyuz Baikonur Progress M-15M LEO Roscosmos RSC Energia ISS Cargo
26-Apr-12 Long March 2C Jiuquan Gokturk 2 SSO Turkish Military TUBITAK-UZAY Classied
27-Apr-12 Atlas V 531 CCAFS Advanced EHF 2 GEO DoD Lockheed Martin Communications
Apr-12 Zenit 3SLB Baikonur Lybid 1 GEO Ukraine Space Agency NPO Yuzhnoye Communications
Apr-12 Soyuz 2 Baikonur Resurs P1 SSO Roscosmos Khrunichev State Research &
Production Space Center
Remote Sensing
01-May-12 V + Antares Wallops FF * Cygnus COTS Demo LEO Orbital Sciences Corp. Orbital Sciences Corp. Test TBA
23-May-12 Soyuz Baikonur MetOp B SSO Eumetsat EADS Astrium Meteorological
30-May-12 Soyuz Baikonur Soyuz TMA-05M LEO Roscosmos RSC Energia Crewed
May-12 Proton M Baikonur MLM LEO Roscosmos Korolev NPO Energia ISS Cargo
20-Jun-12 Atlas V 401 Vandenberg AFB NRO L-38 TBD NRO Classied Classied
26-Jun-12 H IIB Tanegashima HTV 3 LEO JAXA
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries ISS Cargo
28-Jun-12 Delta IV Heavy CCAFS NRO L-15 TBD NRO Classied Classied
Jun-12 Ariane 5 ECA Kourou MSG 3 GEO Eumetsat Thales Alenia Space Meteorological
Jun-12 H IIA Tanegashima GCOM W1
Arirang 3 (Kompsat 3)
SDS 4
Horyu 2
SSO
SSO
SSO
LEO
JAXA
KARI
JAXA
Kyushu Institute of
Technology
TBA
KARI/EADS Astrium
JAXA
Kyushu Institute of
Technology
Scientic
Remote Sensing
Development
Scientic
V
Denotes commercial launch, dened as a launch that is internationally competed or FAA-licensed, or privately nanced launch activity. For multiple manifested launches, certain secondary
payloads whose launches were commercially procured may also constitute a commercial launch.
+ Denotes FAA-licensed launch.
* Denotes a commercial payload, dened as a spacecraft that serves a commercial function or is operated by a commercial entity.
L and M refer to the outcome of the Launch and Mission: S=Success, P=Partial Success, F=Failure.
Notes: All prices are estimates.
All launch dates are as of December 31, 2011, and are based on local time at the launch site.
See Appendix III for denitions of payload orbits.
• 28 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
APPENDIX II (CONTINUED)
Date Vehicle Site Payload(s) Orbit Operator Manufacturer Use
Comm'l
Price
Jun-12 Soyuz 2 Kourou Galileo 3
Galileo 4
MEO
MEO
European Space Agency
European Space Agency
EADS Astrium
EADS Astrium
Navigation
Navigation
Jun-12 Soyuz 2 Plesetsk Glonass K1-2 MEO Russian Space Forces Reshetnev Company Navigation
2Q-12 Ariane 5 ECA Kourou Vinasat 2 GEO Vietnam Telecom
International
Lockheed Martin Communications
2Q-12 V Ariane 5 ECA Kourou * Intelsat 20 GEO Intelsat Space Systems/Loral Communications $220M
2Q-12 V Proton M Baikonur * Intelsat 21 GEO Intelsat Boeing Communications $85M
2Q-12 V Ariane 5 ECA Kourou * Alphasat I-XL GEO Inmarsat EADS Astrium Communications $220M
2Q-12 V Ariane 5 ECA Kourou * JCSAT 13 GEO Sky Perfect JSAT Group Lockheed Martin Communications $220M
2Q-12 V Proton M Baikonur * Astra 4B (SES-5) GEO SES World Skies Space Systems/Loral Communications $85M
V
Denotes commercial launch, dened as a launch that is internationally competed or FAA-licensed, or privately nanced launch activity. For multiple manifested launches, certain secondary
payloads whose launches were commercially procured may also constitute a commercial launch.
+ Denotes FAA-licensed launch.
* Denotes a commercial payload, dened as a spacecraft that serves a commercial function or is operated by a commercial entity.
L and M refer to the outcome of the Launch and Mission: S=Success, P=Partial Success, F=Failure.
Notes: All prices are estimates.
All launch dates are as of December 31, 2011, and are based on local time at the launch site.
See Appendix III for denitions of payload orbits.
• 29 •
2011 Year in Review
• 28 •
ACRONYMS FOR APPENDIX I AND II
AMS Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer
CAST China Academy for Space Technology
CCAFS Cape Canaveral Air Force Station
CNSA China National Space Administration
CONAE National Commission on Space Activities, Argentina
COTS Commercial Orbital Transportation Services
CRS Commercial Resupply Services
DoD Department of Defense
ELC Express Logistics Carrier
ESA European Space Agency
GSFC Goddard Space Flight Center
IAI Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd.
ISRO Indian Space Research Organization
ISS International Space Station
JAXA Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency
KARI Korean Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
KSC NASA Kennedy Space Center
LMC Lightweight Multi-purpose Carrier
MPLM Multi-purpose Pressurized Logistics Carrier
NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASRDA National Space Research and Development Agency, Nigeria
NOAA United States National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
NRO National Reconnaissance Oce
PMM Permanent Multi-purpose Module
Russian MoD Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
SAS Shanghai Academy of Space Technology, China
SBA Shanghai Bureau of Astronautics, China
SUPARCO Pakistan Space and Upper Atmosphere Research Commission
ULA United Launch Alliance
USA United Space Alliance
USAF United States Air Force
USEF Institute for Unmanned Space Experiment Free Flyer (USEF), Japan
VAFB Vandenberg Air Force Base
• 30 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
APPENDIX III: DEFINITIONS
COMMERCIAL SUBORBITAL OR ORBITAL LAUNCH
A commercial suborbital or orbital launch has one or more of the following characteristics:
• e launch is licensed by FAA/AST.
• e primary payload’s launch contract was internationally competed (see denition
of internationally competed below). A primary payload is generally dened as the
payload with the greatest mass on a launch vehicle for a given launch.
• e launch is privately nanced without government support.
LAUNCH FAILURE
e payload did not reach a usable orbit (an orbit where some portion of the mission
could be salvaged) or was destroyed as the result of a launch vehicle malfunction.
INTERNATIONALLY COMPETED
An internationally competed launch contract is one in which the launch opportunity
was available in principle to any capable launch service provider. An internationally
competed launch is considered commercial.
COMMERCIAL PAYLOAD
A commercial payload is described as having one or both of the following
characteristics:
• e payload is operated by a private company.
• e payload is funded by the government, but provides satellite service partially
or totally through a private or semi-private company. is distinction is usually
applied to certain telecommunication satellites whose transponders are partially or
totally leased to a variety of organizations, some or all of which generate revenues.
Examples are Russias Express and Ekran series of spacecra. All other payloads
are classied as noncommercial (government civil, government military, or non-
prot).
ORBITS
• Geosynchronous Earth orbit (GSO): A spacecra in GSO is synchronized with
the Earths rotation, orbiting once every 24 hours, and appears to an observer on
the ground to be stationary in the sky.
• Geostationary Earth orbit (GEO): GEO is a broad category used for any circular
orbit at an altitude of 35,852 kilometers (22,277 miles) with a low inclination
(over the equator).
• 31 •
2011 Year in Review
• Non-geosynchronous orbit (NGSO): NGSO satellites are those in orbits other
than GEO, including:
• Low Earth orbit (LEO): lowest achievable orbit, about 2,400 kilometers,
• Medium Earth orbit (MEO): 2,400 kilometers to GEO,
• Elliptical (ELI): a highly elliptical orbit,
• External (EXT): used for trajectories beyond GEO (such as interplanetary
trajectories), and
• Sun-synchronous orbit (SSO): an orbit that passes over the same part of the
Earth at roughly the same time each day.
PAYLOAD USE
• Classied: Any system whose purpose is ocially deemed classied or cannot be
ocially veried.
• Communications: Any system designed to receive and transmit data for purposes
of facilitating communications. is includes xed satellite services, mobile
satellite services, military communications, store-and-forward systems, asset
tracking, and similar.
• Crewed: Any system designed primarily to transport humans into, through, or
back from space.
• Development: Any system whose purpose is to advance hardware design as part of
a research and development program.
• ISS: Any system designed primarily to transport cargo into, through, or back from
the International Space Station (ISS).
• Meteorological: Any system designed to monitor the Earths weather for
forecasting and issuing weather watches and warnings.
• Navigation: Any system designed to provide signals for accurate timing,
positioning, and navigation.
• Remote Sensing: Any civil and commercial system designed to gather data by
means of optical (panchromatic, multispectral, or hyperspectral) or radar sensors.
• Scientic: Any system designed to gather data about astrophysics, astronomy,
biology, cosmology, celestial bodies, physics, and the space environment. is
designation also includes systems designed to monitor the Earth, except those
systems designed specically for meteorology.
• Te s t : Any system designed to provide telemetry and data on launch vehicle
performance.
• Unknown: Any system whose mission is unknown.
• Other: Any system whose purpose does not t in any of the provided categories.
• 32 •
Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation
PAYLOAD MASS CLASS
Payloads are divided into the following mass classes based on mass on the ground (not
in orbit):
• Micro: Up to 91 kg (200 lbs)
• Small: 92 to 907 kg (201 to 2,000 lbs)
• Medium: 908 to 2,268 kg (2,001 to 5,000 lbs)
• Intermediate: 2,269 to 4,536 kg (5,001 to 10,000 lbs)
• Large: 4,537 to 9,072 kg (10,001 to 20,000 lbs)
• Heavy: Greater than 9,072 kg (20,000 lbs)